2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PVC membrane and coated graphite potentiometric sensors based on 1-phenyl-3-pyridin-2-yl-thiourea for selective determination of iron(III)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To measure the concentration of iron, current techniques used are expensive and require trained analytical chemists. Recently, a potentiometric device was made by Motlagh et al 27 to speed up water sample analysis in a cost efficient and accessible way. Here, they used a PVC membrane electrode and a coated graphite electrode with 1-phenyl-3-pyridin-2-yl-thiourea (PPT) as the iron carrier.…”
Section: Potentiometric Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the concentration of iron, current techniques used are expensive and require trained analytical chemists. Recently, a potentiometric device was made by Motlagh et al 27 to speed up water sample analysis in a cost efficient and accessible way. Here, they used a PVC membrane electrode and a coated graphite electrode with 1-phenyl-3-pyridin-2-yl-thiourea (PPT) as the iron carrier.…”
Section: Potentiometric Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data reported in Table give a comparison between previously reported Fe(III)‐selective electrodes and the present proposed electrodes with respect to slope, linear range, pH, response time and detection limit . It is noteworthy that the slope, linear range, response time and selectivity coefficients of the proposed electrodes are considerably improved with respect to those of the previously reported Fe(III)‐selective electrodes (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In Table 4, some recent optical and electrochemical sensors for Fe 3 + detection have been compared. It should be noted that proposed sensors show relatively better selectivity, lower detection limit and wide concentration range as compared to the previously reported methods for the determination of Fe(III) [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Comparison Studymentioning
confidence: 91%