2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PV cell and module efficient parameters estimation using Evaporation Rate based Water Cycle Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To show the additional advantage of COA over other techniques, we conducted a comparison in terms of required time for one iteration. In that sense, in MATLAB 2015 (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) we have implemented the following algorithms for solar cell parameter estimation: evaporation rate-based water cycle algorithm (ER-WCA) [19], cuckoo search (CS) [46] and harmony search (HS) [48]. ER-WCA algorithm has a very good accuracy, very close to that obtained by the proposed method (see Table 1).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To show the additional advantage of COA over other techniques, we conducted a comparison in terms of required time for one iteration. In that sense, in MATLAB 2015 (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) we have implemented the following algorithms for solar cell parameter estimation: evaporation rate-based water cycle algorithm (ER-WCA) [19], cuckoo search (CS) [46] and harmony search (HS) [48]. ER-WCA algorithm has a very good accuracy, very close to that obtained by the proposed method (see Table 1).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It can be seen that COA outperforms several other techniques, such as evaporation rate-based water cycle algorithm (ER-WPA) [19] and cat swarm optimization (CSO) [24] for SDM, and with the generalized opposition-flower pollination algorithm-nelder-mead simplex method (GOFPANM) [53], by a small margin. However, the implementation of COA is simpler than implementation of ER-WPA, CSO and GOFPANM.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to simulate, manage and optimize the real solar systems, many optimization techniques dealt with the identification of PV cell parameters. Guaranteed convergence particle swarm optimization (GCPSO) [1], enhanced leader particle swarm optimization (ELPSO) [2], improved JAYA (IJAYA) [3], artificial bee colony (ABC) [4], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [5,6], genetic algorithms (GA) [7][8][9], evaporation rate based water cycle algorithm (ER-WCA) [10], simulated annealing (SA) [7], harmony search (HS) [11], teaching-learning based optimization (TBLO) [12], Bacterial Foraging Algorithm (BFA) [13], imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) [14], self-adaptive teaching learning based optimization (SATLBO) [15], bird matting optimization (BMO) [16] and salp swarm algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiong et al solved the parameter extraction problem of different PV models by using several metaheuristics including symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm [24], improved WOA based on two modified prey searching strategies [25], and hybrid DE with WOA [26]. In addition to the aforementioned metaheuristics, many more [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] have also been presented to solve the important problem. e abovementioned metaheuristics have, to some extent, proven themselves promising methods for the parameter extraction problem of PV models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%