2014
DOI: 10.1080/14754835.2014.919218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Putting “Traditional Values” Into Practice: The Rise and Contestation of Anti-Homopropaganda Laws in Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
73
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, in several acceding countries as well as in the European neighborhood, state-sponsored homophobia-a state strategy to use homophobia as a political instrument for nation-building and political power legitimation-came forward, reinforcing a clear-cut divide between East and West in Europe (Weiss and Bosia 2013, 2-3). Some of the countries went as far as banning or dispersing LGBTIrelated events, or in other ways interfering in the intimate spheres of gender and sexuality through law and governmental policies (Buyantueva and Shevtsova 2019; Essig and Kondakov 2019;Kuhar and Paternotte 2017;Wilkinson 2014). While legal changes related to LGBTI rights, as well as the political homophobia accompanying them, have been widely covered by many scholars, little has been done to address the societal impact of EU norms promotion in third countries that would include not only legal changes but also those of public and political elites (Slootmaeckers and O'Dwyer 2018, 23).…”
Section: Europeanization and Political Homophobia In Third Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, in several acceding countries as well as in the European neighborhood, state-sponsored homophobia-a state strategy to use homophobia as a political instrument for nation-building and political power legitimation-came forward, reinforcing a clear-cut divide between East and West in Europe (Weiss and Bosia 2013, 2-3). Some of the countries went as far as banning or dispersing LGBTIrelated events, or in other ways interfering in the intimate spheres of gender and sexuality through law and governmental policies (Buyantueva and Shevtsova 2019; Essig and Kondakov 2019;Kuhar and Paternotte 2017;Wilkinson 2014). While legal changes related to LGBTI rights, as well as the political homophobia accompanying them, have been widely covered by many scholars, little has been done to address the societal impact of EU norms promotion in third countries that would include not only legal changes but also those of public and political elites (Slootmaeckers and O'Dwyer 2018, 23).…”
Section: Europeanization and Political Homophobia In Third Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, relative freedom of the 1990s and early 2000s has been decreasing since the political turmoil of 2011-2012 and following the 2014 Russian-Ukrainian conflict (Gel'man 2015). Greater state control in contemporary Russia-which encompasses, inter alia, the tendency to limit citizens' freedoms (Lasnier 2017;Tysiachniouk, Tulaeva, and Henry 2018;Wilkinson 2014), stifle protest activity (Bogush 2017;Shulman 2017;van der Vet 2017), and punish activists, journalists and bloggers (Roache 2017); increased interference in the world of mass media (Etkind 2015), art, and culture; 11 tighter surveillance of private entrepreneurship (Economist 2017); rising secrecy of national spending (Movchan 2017;Tkachov 2017;Tkachov and Makarov 2017)-all have impacted the broader sociopolitical setting in which academic knowledge production takes place.…”
Section: The State's Contradictory Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LGBT rights, depending on a country's orientation. Indeed, it has been argued that in those countries resisting the homonationalist interpretation of modernity, the international politicisation of LGBT rights has caused backlashes (Weiss and Bosia 2013;Wilkinson 2014). The anti-gay propaganda laws in Russia and the so-called 'Kill the Gays Bill' in Uganda are only two examples in which the international push for LGBT rights has reduced the space for LGBT activism in the domestic arena.…”
Section: Situating the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%