2012
DOI: 10.1177/1532708612453005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Putting the Family Into the Military Mission

Abstract: What are the challenges of doing feminist research within a military institution? This became the guiding force of my research with the Midwest Family Program of the National Guard (MWFP). This article examines both my experiences as a feminist scholar conducting research in a military institution as well as the gendered tensions within the MWFP. While in the field, my research shifted from a traditional ethnographic study to a deeply personal autoethnographic project. Analyzing my interviews, documents from M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption of cattiness on the part of other wives stems from both constructs of gender within the realm of the military community and everyday constructs of gender that we find in civilian life (Armstrong et al, 2014;Bettie, 2003;Currie et al, 2007;Miller, 2016); moreover, the stigmatization of drama, catty, or "bitchy" behavior serves to police women in their daily lives while also constructing femininity. These stakes are ever heightened in the super masculine world of the military, as feminization is arguably exponentially stigmatized (Karney & Crown, 2007;Weber, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assumption of cattiness on the part of other wives stems from both constructs of gender within the realm of the military community and everyday constructs of gender that we find in civilian life (Armstrong et al, 2014;Bettie, 2003;Currie et al, 2007;Miller, 2016); moreover, the stigmatization of drama, catty, or "bitchy" behavior serves to police women in their daily lives while also constructing femininity. These stakes are ever heightened in the super masculine world of the military, as feminization is arguably exponentially stigmatized (Karney & Crown, 2007;Weber, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to being greedy, the military is a highly gendered institution (Acker, 1992;Karney & Crown, 2007;Weber, 2012) that thrives on traditional patriarchal structures, where the conforming wife is tasked with holding the family together thus enabling the husband to be free to pursue his career (Bowen & Orthner, 1983;Harrell, 2000;Harrison, 2006;Taber, 2009). Despite changing demographics, heterosexual women make up 89.9-97.7% of the military spouse population (Department of Defense, 2014), and therefore, the spouse figure is still overwhelmingly female and exists in a traditional marriage (i.e., heterosexual with traditional gender roles).…”
Section: Military As a Gendered Institutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to being greedy, the military is a highly gendered institution (Acker 1992;Christensen 2014;Enloe 2000;Gray 2016;Weber 2012), instituting a militarysexual division of labor (Hyde 2015) that is predicated on normalizing hypermasculine ideals and traditional heterosexual gender divisions. This hypermasculinity pervades all areas of military life, even the private family realm, where those actions and roles most geared toward achieving the mission are valorized, privileged, and masculinized, and those activities deemed secondary are less valued and feminized (Hautzinger and Scandlyn 2013;Weinstein 1997).…”
Section: The Military Spouse Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%