2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-04011-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Putting the ‘Experiment’ back into the ‘Thought Experiment’

Abstract: Philosophers have debated at length the epistemological status of scientific thought experiments. I contend that the literature on this topic still lacks a common conceptual framework, a lacuna that produces radical disagreement among the participants in this debate. To remedy this problem, I suggest focusing on the distinction between the internal and the external validity of an experiment, which is also crucial for thought experiments. I then develop an account of both kinds of validity in the context of tho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment is subject to the requirement of repeatability. Conditions are chosen and manipulated deliberately, and the effects produced by this manipulation are then measured [39]. The experiment is the main method used to address the problem under investigation and obtain answers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment is subject to the requirement of repeatability. Conditions are chosen and manipulated deliberately, and the effects produced by this manipulation are then measured [39]. The experiment is the main method used to address the problem under investigation and obtain answers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many answer yes because thought experiments have been so important in the history of science, for example, with Galileo, Newton, Einstein, and others. (Sartori 2023, 2) Sartori presents three different answers to how thought experiments provide us with new knowledge -Platonism, objectualism, and structuralism (Sartori 2023, 3).…”
Section: An Overview Of the Debate And Sartori's Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent article, Lorenzo Sartori (Sartori 2023) argues that the discussion on this topic lacks an overarching theoretical framework. He provides a useful classification of positions but claims that no one has succeeded in giving a clear answer on how thought experiments provide us with new knowledge about the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%