2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.968853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Putting sharks on the map: A global standard for improving shark area-based conservation

Abstract: Area-based conservation is essential to safeguard declining biodiversity. Several approaches have been developed for identifying networks of globally important areas based on the delineation of sites or seascapes of importance for various elements of biodiversity (e.g., birds, marine mammals). Sharks, rays, and chimaeras are facing a biodiversity crisis with an estimated 37% of species threatened with extinction driven by overfishing. Yet spatial planning tools often fail to consider the habitat needs critical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patterns of risk we identify are largely driven by the catch of blue sharks, which represent ~78% of all shark catch reported by tRFMOs globally between 2012-2020 (Supplementary Material, Table S9). These catch risk hotspots can be compared to biologically important areas for blue sharks and other shark species (e.g., Hyde et al, 2022). For example, catch risk hotspots identified off the coast of Southwest Africa occur in a known potential blue shark nursery habitat off the coast of Namibia where a high catch density of immature sharks have been recorded by onboard observers (Coelho et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The patterns of risk we identify are largely driven by the catch of blue sharks, which represent ~78% of all shark catch reported by tRFMOs globally between 2012-2020 (Supplementary Material, Table S9). These catch risk hotspots can be compared to biologically important areas for blue sharks and other shark species (e.g., Hyde et al, 2022). For example, catch risk hotspots identified off the coast of Southwest Africa occur in a known potential blue shark nursery habitat off the coast of Namibia where a high catch density of immature sharks have been recorded by onboard observers (Coelho et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our results primarily represent a few commonly reported species, pelagic longlines have the potential to interact with numerous shark species (n = 15 unique species and 5 higher order classifications are included here) with highly variable life histories and movement capacities, which can present challenges for designing effective spatial management to rebuild overexploited populations. Further work is needed to identify where shark catch risk hotspots align with ecologically important areas, such as aggregation sites and migration corridors, to ensure area-based protection and management are effective for intended species (Boerder et al, 2019;Gilman et al, 2019;Hyde et al, 2022). Behavioral considerations, including philopatry and movement capacity, will further determine which shark populations are most likely to respond to spatial management measures (Boerder et al, 2019), and future efforts will need to examine the seasonality and persistence of catch risk hotspots to determine whether static or dynamic management is preferred.…”
Section: B a Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fishing bans of mobulids should also be considered throughout their range, while identifying mobulid aggregations at specific times and locations can offer important management and conservation opportunities (Clark et al, 2014) such as the designation of spatial protection areas. Such an approach is being included in the identification of Important Shark and Ray Areas (ISRAs) for mobulids (Hyde et al, 2022). Furthermore, socio-economic surveys among fishermen communities and associated stakeholders should also be implemented to understand the economic and social impacts that can arise from such management designations (e.g., Peru; Guirkinger et al, 2021 and Indonesia;Booth et al, 2020;Booth et al, 2021).…”
Section: Fisheriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial protection, particularly if based on ISRAs, can play an important role in protecting populations from anthropogenic impacts at aggregation sites (Germanov et al, 2019;Murray et al, 2020;Setyawan et al, 2022b). ISRAs provide refereed, actionable information on sites that are critical to mobulid survival, such as aggregations (Hyde et al, 2022). While it is likely not feasible to protect the entire home ranges of most mobulid species, aggregation sites for mobulids may encompass important areas for critical life history stages (Marshall and Bennett, 2010a;Stevens, 2016;Germanov et al, 2019;Setyawan et al, 2022b).…”
Section: Spatial Protection and Important Shark And Ray Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Argentinean waters, known egg-laying and nursery areas within MPAs are under legislation that allows for shing activities. In this regard, this study becomes relevant because it shows that the MPAs located at the BB allow protection of egg-laying grounds, critical areas for chondrichthyansÂŽ survival according to The Important Shark and Ray Area (ISRA) approach, that provides a framework to identify areas of interest for the conservation of chondrichthyans based on different criteria, such as the presence of reproductive areas (sub-criteria C1) (Hyde et al 2022). These results show the importance of the MPAs located at BB for the conservation of several species of oviparous chondrichthyans in southern waters of the South West Atlantic.…”
Section: Embryonic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%