Putting Architecture in its Social Place: A Cultural Political Economy of Architecture

Abstract

As well as being shaped by bureaucratically codifi ed state regulations, architecture is also fundamentally conditioned by the broader political-economic context in which it is commissioned, designed and understood. However, drawing attention to these noncodifi ed regulations can be controversial, as it necessitates questioning the complex social production of architecture, in the process challenging those discourses that position architecture as a practice concerned primarily with the design of socially meaningful form and meaning. Such discourses have been problematised elsewhere and, building on these contributions, this paper suggests a framework for taking seriously architecture's distinctive relationship with aesthetics and semiotics while also maintaining a sense of architects' position as a cultural élite working in defi nite political-economic contexts. Drawing primarily on theories associated with Pierre Bourdieu and cultural political economy, the paper uses the case of iconic architecture to illustrate this argument. The central role of architecture in recent place-marketing strategies is understood as a resonance between the agendas of high-profi le architects and those political and economic agencies 'selling places'. The role of architecture in providing a culturalised frame within which economic transformation is embedded is a crucial consideration here. In short, this paper suggests the necessity of a non-reductionist, political-economic foundation to the regulation and built environment research agenda. 0042-0980 Print/1360-063X Online

Spatial agency and practising architecture beyond buildings

“…Subsequently, over the last decade or so, there has been renewed interest in architecture among social and cultural geographers animating buildings as lived-in (Kraftl, 2009;Lees & Baxter, 2011) and living things (Cairns & Jacobs, 2014;Jacobs, 2006;Strebel, 2011). As such, this has displaced much of the previous research whereby architecture acts as a referent to understand broader social, political and historical contexts (although see Jones (2009) as a notable recent exception). Through individual building case studies, a focus upon the many other actors and actants involved in practising architectures has rejuvenated what the geographies of architecture might look like, challenging assumptions that buildings can be understood as solid, static objects.…”

Form Follows Function: On the Interaction between Real Estate Finance and Urban Spatial Structure

“…As such, my argument is part of a wider discussion about the political economy of regulation and the process of building cities. A central element of this discourse maintains that architecture is fundamentally in uenced by the noncodied regulations of its broader political-economic context (see Jones, 2009). …”

Materializing Spanish-Colonial Revival Architecture

“…Building was (and still is) big business, and there was a whole "culture industry" behind it (Coclanis 1985;Jones 2009;Logan and Molotch 2007). Thus, if cultural producers in the late nineteenth century were already aware that "place" mattered, by the 1920s, the complexity of selling "place" had only become more intricate.…”