2010
DOI: 10.1257/app.2.4.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Put Your Money Where Your Butt Is: A Commitment Contract for Smoking Cessation

Abstract: We designed and tested a voluntary commitment product to help smokers quit smoking. The product (CARES) offered smokers a savings account in which they deposit funds for six months, after which they take a urine test for nicotine and cotinine. If they pass, their money is returned; otherwise, their money is forfeited to charity. Of smokers offered CARES, 11 percent took up, and smokers randomly offered CARES were 3 percentage points more likely to pass the 6-month test than the control group. More importantly,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
147
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(24 reference statements)
7
147
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These same principles have been applied in many other areas of health, such as smoking cessation, diabetes control and organ donation [25,68,69]. We make the case for their application in PMTCT to address demand-side challenges of uptake and retention as outlined in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These same principles have been applied in many other areas of health, such as smoking cessation, diabetes control and organ donation [25,68,69]. We make the case for their application in PMTCT to address demand-side challenges of uptake and retention as outlined in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kremer, and Mullainathan (2010) documented 35% take-up of commitment pay-schemes. Giné, Karlan, and Zinman (2010) found 11% take-up of commitment saving accounts to stop smoking. Meier and Sprenger (2015) studied time invariance (stability) among low income U.S. tax filers.…”
Section: Consistency With Other Experimental Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions include Ariely and Wertenbroch (2002) on homework assignments, Beshears, Choi, Laibson, and Madrian (2011) on commitment savings devices in the United States, and Houser, Schunk, Winter, and Xiao (2010) on a laboratory experiment in which subjects gain relevant experience. Gine, Karlan, and Zinman (2010) wrote that "there is little field evidence on the demand for or effectiveness of such commitment devices." For recent surveys, see Bryan, Karlan, and Nelson (2010) and DellaVigna (2009).…”
Section: Designing Accounts To Promote Savingmentioning
confidence: 99%