2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pushing the frontiers of unconstrained face detection and recognition: IARPA Janus Benchmark A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
582
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 639 publications
(603 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
582
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar large-scale databases for facial landmark localisation include 300 W (Sagonas et al 2013b) LFPW (Belhumeur et al 2013), AFLW (Köstinger et al 2011) and HELEN (Le et al 2012). Similarly, for face recognition there exists LFW (Huang et al 2007), FRVT (Phillips et al 2000) and the recently introduced Janus database (IJB-A) (Klare et al 2015). -The establishment of in-the-wild benchmarks and challenges that provide a fair comparison between state of the art techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar large-scale databases for facial landmark localisation include 300 W (Sagonas et al 2013b) LFPW (Belhumeur et al 2013), AFLW (Köstinger et al 2011) and HELEN (Le et al 2012). Similarly, for face recognition there exists LFW (Huang et al 2007), FRVT (Phillips et al 2000) and the recently introduced Janus database (IJB-A) (Klare et al 2015). -The establishment of in-the-wild benchmarks and challenges that provide a fair comparison between state of the art techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-The establishment of in-the-wild benchmarks and challenges that provide a fair comparison between state of the art techniques. FDDB (Jain and Learned-Miller 2010), 300 W (Sagonas et al 2013a(Sagonas et al , 2015 and Janus (Klare et al 2015) are the most characteristic examples for face detection, facial landmark localisation and face recognition, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face recognition algorithms generally try to address two problems -identify verification and subject identification. Face verification, as known as the 1 : 1 matching problem [11], answers the question, are these two people actually the same?, while face identification, also known as the 1 : N problem [11], answers the question, who is this person, given a database of faces?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, face recognition problem is far from solved, especially in an uncontrolled environment with extreme pose, illumination, expression and age variations. Indeed, as discussed in [11], state-of-the-art commercial and open-source face recognition systems performed far less than satisfactory on the recently released National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) IARPA Janus Benchmark-A (IJB-A), which is considered much more challenging, than LFW, in terms of the variability in pose, illumination, expression, aging, resolution, etc. [19,15,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that when the tips within an impression could be recognized correctly, the objects all can be located and simple attributes such as edge, spot, and form may be tested [1], [6]- [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%