2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Push-out tests on studs with UHPC cover embedded in UHPC-NSC composite slab

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To meet anchorage requirements and prevent shear studs from being pulled out, EC4 stipulates that the length-to-diameter ratio of studs (the ratio of stud length to stud diameter) in steel-normal concrete composite structures should be greater than 4.0 [12]. However, numerous studies have shown that the shear studs embedded in UHPC may not be subject to this restriction due to the ultra-high compressive and tensile strength, as well as the elastic modulus of UHPC, effectively restricting the deformation of shear studs [13][14][15][16][17]. Therefore, the aspect ratio of shear studs in UHPC is usually between 2.5 and 4.0 and can be classified as short studs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet anchorage requirements and prevent shear studs from being pulled out, EC4 stipulates that the length-to-diameter ratio of studs (the ratio of stud length to stud diameter) in steel-normal concrete composite structures should be greater than 4.0 [12]. However, numerous studies have shown that the shear studs embedded in UHPC may not be subject to this restriction due to the ultra-high compressive and tensile strength, as well as the elastic modulus of UHPC, effectively restricting the deformation of shear studs [13][14][15][16][17]. Therefore, the aspect ratio of shear studs in UHPC is usually between 2.5 and 4.0 and can be classified as short studs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 By examining the failure mechanism of the stud connection and the load-slip curve of the UHPC-steel interface, several studies proposed a shear strength formula and a load-slip relationship of embedded ultra-high-performance concrete studs. [21][22][23][24] Different numerical constitutive models and modeling methods (the cracking element method and the cracking particle method) are employed to reflect elastic-plastic mechanics and brittle fracture of the concrete lining. 25,26 In summary, studs can show the bonding performance between the reinforced steel and concrete and effectively ensure cooperative work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The headed studs might increase the interfacial bond resistance and shear stiffness, enhance the post‐peak bond behavior, and avoid brittle failure, according to Wang et al's push‐out studies on SRC specimens 20 . By examining the failure mechanism of the stud connection and the load‐slip curve of the UHPC‐steel interface, several studies proposed a shear strength formula and a load‐slip relationship of embedded ultra‐high‐performance concrete studs 21–24 . Different numerical constitutive models and modeling methods (the cracking element method and the cracking particle method) are employed to reflect elastic–plastic mechanics and brittle fracture of the concrete lining 25,26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%