Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries 2000
DOI: 10.1145/336597.336674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purpose and usability of digital libraries

Abstract: A preliminary study was conducted to help understand the purpose of digital libraries (DLs) and to investigate whether meaningful results could be obtained from small user studies of digital libraries. Results stress the importance of mental models, and of "traditional" library support.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recognize that there are limitations to our work -we would have liked to have evaluated our solution with a greater sample size, although it is not uncommon in user-centered digital library studies (Fox et al, 1993;Theng et al, 2000); moreover it is a prototypical implementation, offered as a proof-of-concept rather than a final product. This does not mean, however, that the work is without merit.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognize that there are limitations to our work -we would have liked to have evaluated our solution with a greater sample size, although it is not uncommon in user-centered digital library studies (Fox et al, 1993;Theng et al, 2000); moreover it is a prototypical implementation, offered as a proof-of-concept rather than a final product. This does not mean, however, that the work is without merit.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have included Orlikowski's work on the introduction of new groupware, Lotus Notes, across a large organisation [36], and Tracy's account of conflicting frames of reference between callmakers and calltakers at 911 dispatch center [42]. The second concerns the implications of digitising 'traditional' libraries [7,11,14,26,28,29,32,33,34,41]. These researchers and others have problematised the assumption that building a digital library is just a case of translating the components of traditional libraries into their digital equivalents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few researchers have investigated the usability and evaluation of digital libraries and repositories of cultural heritage. This is not the case, however, in the field of traditional scholar digital libraries and bibliographic or fulltext databases, where many studies have been conducted on the evaluation of their usability (Ahmed, McKnight, & Oppenheim, 2004, 2005; Jeng, 2004; Marchionini, 2001; Morris & Balatsoukas, 2006; Theng, Mohd‐Nasir, & Thimbeby, 2000). In one of the few studies on the evaluation of digital cultural heritage collections, Bennett et al (2002) used both focus groups and statistical analysis of use to assess the usability and quality of the Illinois Digital Cultural Heritage Community project.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%