2004
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0753-04.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purinergic and Vanilloid Receptor Activation Releases Glutamate from Separate Cranial Afferent Terminals in Nucleus Tractus Solitarius

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
162
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
17
162
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Propofol did not alter the shape of EPSC events whether evoked or spontaneous, a result consistent with cortical neurons (Kitamura et al, 2003). The latency of ST triggered events is a sensitive, integrated index of axon conduction and terminal excitation that includes voltage dependent channel function such as sodium channels (Jin et al, 2004b;Bailey et al, 2006b). Latency of ST-EPSCs was unaffected by 30 µM propofol.…”
Section: Propofol Does Not Affect Glutamatergic Transmission In Seconsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Propofol did not alter the shape of EPSC events whether evoked or spontaneous, a result consistent with cortical neurons (Kitamura et al, 2003). The latency of ST triggered events is a sensitive, integrated index of axon conduction and terminal excitation that includes voltage dependent channel function such as sodium channels (Jin et al, 2004b;Bailey et al, 2006b). Latency of ST-EPSCs was unaffected by 30 µM propofol.…”
Section: Propofol Does Not Affect Glutamatergic Transmission In Seconsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Cranial visceral afferent excitation of second-order NTS neurons relies on non-NMDA receptor mediated glutamatergic transmission (Jin et al, 2004a;Jin et al, 2004b). Propofol did not alter the shape of EPSC events whether evoked or spontaneous, a result consistent with cortical neurons (Kitamura et al, 2003).…”
Section: Propofol Does Not Affect Glutamatergic Transmission In Seconsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Although submaximal electrical stimulation of the tractus solitarius was used, the anatomical organization of the coronally sectioned caudal brainstem makes it likely that multiple fibers were recruited, unlike the horizontal brainstem preparation that restricts the stimulation to solitary fibers (Doyle and Andresen, 2001;Bailey et al, 2002Bailey et al, , 2006aJin et al, 2004). Nonvagal fibers of passage may also be stimulated during our paradigm, because several CNS areas that project to the NTS use glutamate as a neurotransmitter (Blessing, 1997;Schaffar et al, 1997;Lin et al, 2000) MC4R expressed on nonvagal inputs to NTS neurons enhance glutamatergic currents exclusively The MC4R activated in our experimental conditions appear to be located principally, but not exclusively, on vagal afferent fibers.…”
Section: Mc4r Expressed On Central Terminals Of Vagal Afferent Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ST afferents can be divided into C-fibers and A-fibers by their sensitivity or resistance to CAP, respectively Jin et al, 2004). In five of nine AVP-sensitive, non-failure-type NTS neurons, CAP (200 nM) blocked ST-EPSCs and the remainder were CAP resistant.…”
Section: Avp-sensitive St Afferents Include Both a And C Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%