1978
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2744(78)90142-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purification and comparative properties of the glycoprotein nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide glycohydrolase from rat liver microsomal and plasma membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies on the rat liver enzyme failed to demonstrate a clear-cut difference between the NAD glycohydrolase of microsomes and that of plasma membrane preparations. Both enzymes have nearly the same half-life (19), give a single continuous precipitation line in Ouchterlony double-diffusion immunochemical tests (18), and show similar biochemical characteristics (24). Such experimental data are consistent with NAD glycohydrolase being a constituent of a single membrane entity in the liver.…”
Section: Nad Glycohydrolase Activity In Sinusoidal Cells Obtained By Counterflow Elutriationsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies on the rat liver enzyme failed to demonstrate a clear-cut difference between the NAD glycohydrolase of microsomes and that of plasma membrane preparations. Both enzymes have nearly the same half-life (19), give a single continuous precipitation line in Ouchterlony double-diffusion immunochemical tests (18), and show similar biochemical characteristics (24). Such experimental data are consistent with NAD glycohydrolase being a constituent of a single membrane entity in the liver.…”
Section: Nad Glycohydrolase Activity In Sinusoidal Cells Obtained By Counterflow Elutriationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The presence of NAD glycohydrolase in the endoplasmic reticulum implies a rapid turnover of the cytosolic pyridine coenzymes, as recalled above, if no compartmental hindrance to their breakdown is present. In addition, except for minor differences in carbohydrate composition, comparative studies on the plasmalemmal and microsomal NAD glycohydrolase from rat liver did not reveal noticeable differences in their biochemical (24) and immunological (18) properties, and in their half-lives (19). Finally, there is at present no clear-cut example of an enzyme being a constituent of the endoplasmic reticulum and of plasma membranes in liver cells (11,47).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From results derived in a long series of experiments utilizing NAD + labelled in adenine and nicotiinic moieties (Mandel and Amos, manuscript submitted for publication), designed to answer the question of whether any intact NAD+ can be transported into Nil cells, we are forced to conclude that no detectable NAD+ can be demonstrated to accumulate in Nil cells under a variety of experimental conditions. As do many other cells, Nil cells possess a highly active NAD +-glycohydrolase activity on the plasma membrane surface (ecto-NADase) which rapidly h:ydrolyses the nicotinamide-riboside bond releasing nicotinamide plus ADP-ribose from NAD' (Pekala and Anderson, 1978;DiAugustine et al, 1978;Artman and Seeley, 1979;Pekala et al, 1980). Upon addition of 10 pM NAD + to the cell monolayers, the ecto-NADase activity hydrolyses virtually all the exogenously added NAD + within 30 to 45 minutes (data not shown) and thus little intact NAD+ is left available for accumulation.…”
Section: Effect Of Nicotinamide Deprivation On Intracellularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies have indicated that, e.g. in liver, NAD+ glycohydrolase is a constituent of endoplasmic reticulum, plasma membranes (Bock et al, 1971; Diaugustine et al, 1978), nuclear envelopes (Green & Dobrjansky, 1972;Fukushima et al, 1976;Tamulevicius et al, 1979) and secondary lysosomes (Mellors et al, 1975). The physiological role of this enzyme remains elusive; it was thought to control intracellular concentrations of NAD+ (Kaplan, 1966;Johnson, 1980), but its occurrence at high concentrations in certain tissues was difficult to reconcile with the known turnover rates of the coenzyme in vivo (Bock et al, 1968;Clark & Pinder, 1969;Bernofsky & Pankov, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%