2019
DOI: 10.1080/19476337.2019.1634645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purification and characterization of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) from water yam (Dioscorea alata)

Abstract: Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) is responsible for the enzymatic browning of fruits and vegetables, and thus has negative effects on the quality of food. In this study, extraction and purification of PPO from water yam was performed successfully, and the characteristics of PPO and inhibitors of enzyme activity were analysed. The results showed that PPO activity improved by 4.58-fold through the DEAE-Sepharose and Superdex G-75 purification technique, which reached electrophoretic purity. The enzyme molecular weight w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH optimum of sPPO1 was 6.6 which is close to the pH optima seen for thyme and green Small cherry tomato ( Solanum lycopersycum ) PPOs (Dogan & Dogan, 2004; Saeidian & Rashidzadeh, 2019). For sPPO2 the optimum pH was 6.0, which is the same pH optima seen for water yam ( Dioscore alata ) PPO (Peng et al., 2019). It should be noted that enzyme source, nature of phenolic substrates, extraction methods, oxidation mechanism, structural difference, and localization were responsible for the difference of optimal pH of isozymes (Han et al., 2019; Montero, Ávalos, & Pérez‐Mateos, 2001; Yoruk & Marshall, 2003).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pH optimum of sPPO1 was 6.6 which is close to the pH optima seen for thyme and green Small cherry tomato ( Solanum lycopersycum ) PPOs (Dogan & Dogan, 2004; Saeidian & Rashidzadeh, 2019). For sPPO2 the optimum pH was 6.0, which is the same pH optima seen for water yam ( Dioscore alata ) PPO (Peng et al., 2019). It should be noted that enzyme source, nature of phenolic substrates, extraction methods, oxidation mechanism, structural difference, and localization were responsible for the difference of optimal pH of isozymes (Han et al., 2019; Montero, Ávalos, & Pérez‐Mateos, 2001; Yoruk & Marshall, 2003).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The vast majority of plant‐derived PPOs have a pH optimum between 4.5 and 8.0 (Peng et al., 2019; Ünal & Şener, 2016; Wang et al., 2007; Zawistowski, Biliaderis, & Murray, 1988). Compared with previous literature reports, the pH optimum for mPPO was 7.4, which is closer to that seen for Izmir grapes PPO (Önez, Karakuş, & Pekyardimci, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led to the increased MDA content and accumulation of phenolic compounds, which provided sufficient substrate for enzymatic reaction in the early stage of storage (until the 6th day). At the same time, this temperature was within the best activity temperature range of PPO, and therefore, PPO activity increased [54]. These factors caused the browning degree of G3 to be higher than that of G1 and G2.…”
Section: Variation In Ppo Activity and Contents Of Mda And Total Polyphenols During Storage Periodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The optimum pH of Artichoke tyrosinase was found to be 7.0 (26). Moreover, the optimal pH of water yam and tea leaves enzyme was found to be 6.0 and 8.0 respectively (30)(31). Alike results were also reported where enzyme revealed a maximum activity at 30 o C for flesh of Turkish Jerusalem Artichoke (25), and eggplants (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%