“…While these extensions have provided compelling new arguments on how strain theory may be improved, they are largely unresolved in the empirical literature. Specifically, a number of studies have supported Broidy and Agnew’s (1997) arguments about gender differences in strain theory (Agnew & Brezina, 1997; Baron, 2007; Cullen, Unnever, Hartman, Turner, & Agnew, 2008; Eitle, 2002; Hoffmann & Su, 1997; Jang & Johnson, 2005; Jennings, Piquero, Gover, & Perez, 2009; Mazerolle, 1998; Moon, Hays, & Blurton, 2009; Piquero & Sealock, 2004; Preston, 2006; Sharp, Brewster, & Love, 2005; Sharp, Terling-Watt, Atkins, Gilliam, & Sanders, 2001; Sigfusdottir, Asgeirsdottir, Gudjonsson, & Sigurdsson, 2008; Sigfusdottir & Silver, 2009), but this perspective has not been well integrated into the context of Agnew’s (1997) views on strain theory as a way to explain crime over the life course. Furthermore, the idea that some types of strain are more likely to produce crime and delinquency than others has not been fully explored.…”