2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pure ionic liquid electrolytes compatible with a graphitized carbon negative electrode in rechargeable lithium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
413
3
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 546 publications
(426 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
413
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiencies are low from the beginning and, as for LiTDI, the capacity decay at C/10 is marked and no capacity can be cycled after the rate-test with this electrolyte. If we compare with LiBF4 (Figure 4e), the less conductive electrolyte, we can see that the LiBF4 electrolyte performs far better with, in particular, well defined insertion plateaus at C/5 and stable capacity, which shows the poor properties of the SEI layers formed in the LiFSI electrolyte (be them on Li metal or graphite), whereas this salt has shown good performance vs. either graphite or Li metal, in either carbonate-based electrolytes [36,60] or in ionic liquidsbased electrolytes [61,62]. LiTFSI (Figure 4d) shows decent initial performance with well-defined plateaus until C/5.…”
Section: This Contrasts To What Was Reported In Ec-based Electrolymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The efficiencies are low from the beginning and, as for LiTDI, the capacity decay at C/10 is marked and no capacity can be cycled after the rate-test with this electrolyte. If we compare with LiBF4 (Figure 4e), the less conductive electrolyte, we can see that the LiBF4 electrolyte performs far better with, in particular, well defined insertion plateaus at C/5 and stable capacity, which shows the poor properties of the SEI layers formed in the LiFSI electrolyte (be them on Li metal or graphite), whereas this salt has shown good performance vs. either graphite or Li metal, in either carbonate-based electrolytes [36,60] or in ionic liquidsbased electrolytes [61,62]. LiTFSI (Figure 4d) shows decent initial performance with well-defined plateaus until C/5.…”
Section: This Contrasts To What Was Reported In Ec-based Electrolymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(DEME-TFSA) [4], 1-ethyl-3-methylimizadolium bis(fluorosulfonyl) amide (EMI-FSA) [5], and N-methyl-N-propylpyrrolidinium bis(fluorosulfonyl) amide (P 13 -FSA) [6].…”
Section: N N-diethyl-n-methyl-n-(2-methoxyethyl) Ammonium Bis(triflumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various IL-based electrolytes, only FSI ¹ -based IL electrolytes can make a Li-ion battery operate without any electrolyte additives. [1][2][3] The Li-ion batteries assembled with FSI ¹ -based IL electrolytes show quite good electrode/electrolyte interfacial performance. [4][5][6] However, the control of electrochemical stability of EMImFSIbased IL electrolytes at a graphite electrode/electrolyte interface is quite difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%