2017
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pure ground-glass nodules: are they really indolent?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They discuss the applicability of those parameters and their current limitations with respect to clinical practice (2). Both, Milanese et al and Cohen et al confirm our opinion that in the assessment of pure GGNs on a single CT scan, two dimensional CT size, as recommended by current guidelines (6)(7)(8), may be sufficient for clinical risk estimation (1,2). They also confirm that more sophisticated parameters such as volume, density, and roundness may play a lesser role (1,2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They discuss the applicability of those parameters and their current limitations with respect to clinical practice (2). Both, Milanese et al and Cohen et al confirm our opinion that in the assessment of pure GGNs on a single CT scan, two dimensional CT size, as recommended by current guidelines (6)(7)(8), may be sufficient for clinical risk estimation (1,2). They also confirm that more sophisticated parameters such as volume, density, and roundness may play a lesser role (1,2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This aspect of our findings, thus, has immediate practical implications. However, future longitudinal follow-up studies with these parameters investigated will show if they can provide useful incremental information with regard to prognosis and outcome (1,2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%