2015
DOI: 10.1186/s11671-015-0782-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pure electron-electron dephasing in percolative aluminum ultrathin film grown by molecular beam epitaxy

Abstract: We have successfully grown ultrathin continuous aluminum film by molecular beam epitaxy. This percolative aluminum film is single crystalline and strain free as characterized by transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. The weak anti-localization effect is observed in the temperature range of 1.4 to 10 K with this sample, and it reveals that, for the first time, the dephasing is purely caused by electron-electron inelastic scattering in aluminum.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation is the existence of electronic quantum size effect in sample A. 6,19,23,24 It could be the first room-temperature observation of quantum size effect in metals but further investigations are certainly needed to confirm this point. In addition, even for sample A of 3-nm Al, the room-temperature resistivity is as low as 10 -7 Ω-m, which enables the applications such as transparent electrodes in light emitting devices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is the existence of electronic quantum size effect in sample A. 6,19,23,24 It could be the first room-temperature observation of quantum size effect in metals but further investigations are certainly needed to confirm this point. In addition, even for sample A of 3-nm Al, the room-temperature resistivity is as low as 10 -7 Ω-m, which enables the applications such as transparent electrodes in light emitting devices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 and 6, and provide values for the complex impedance Z S , quality factor Q S , and surface inductance L S . [43]; g [44]; h [45]; i [46]; j [47]; k [48]; l ξ = (ℏD/2πk B T ), T = 100 mK.…”
Section: Calculation Approaches and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sum up, following the common practice [15,16,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], we describe the magnetoconductance taking into account contrib utions (1), ( 7), ( 10) and ( 9):…”
Section: The Maki-thompson Contribution (Mt) Coming Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy can be eliminated if we consider electron-electron attraction strength β as a second fitting param eter (figures 4(b) and (c)), as it was done in [15,38,[40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Critically Disordered Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%