2002
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2362.00102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pure Contagion and Investors’ Shifting Risk Appetite: Analytical Issues and Empirical Evidence

Abstract: This paper discusses a 'pure' form of financial contagion, unrelated to economic fundamentals -investors' shifting appetite for risk. It provides an analytical framework for identifying changes in investors' risk appetite and discusses whether it is possible to directly measure them in a way that can enable policy makers to differentiate between financial contagion and domestic fundamentals as the immediate source of a crisis. Daily measures of risk appetite are computed and their usefulness in predicting fina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, despite the declining level of global integration after the 2008 crisis, policy makers in the emerging Asian economies should have a framework in place to assess and monitor this type of transmission mechanism of financial crisis (e.g., the daily measures of risk appetite proposed by Kumar and Persaud (2002)) to be able to react quickly and effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, despite the declining level of global integration after the 2008 crisis, policy makers in the emerging Asian economies should have a framework in place to assess and monitor this type of transmission mechanism of financial crisis (e.g., the daily measures of risk appetite proposed by Kumar and Persaud (2002)) to be able to react quickly and effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus necessary to posit an explicit model of risk aversion-or its inverse, 'risk tolerance' or 'risk appetite' as it is known by market participants. Kumar and Persaud (2001) argue that most of the indicators used to proxy risk tolerance in the literature confuse the level of risk itself with risk tolerance: asset prices (or yield spreads) are in practice a function of both underlying risk and risk tolerance, this latter containing structural components (the underlying utility function and financial market structure) and a time varying element reflecting shorter-term factors such as so-called 'wake up calls'. 9 When these result from major collapses in emerging markets (such as the 1998 Russian crash), the effect on home risk appetite then affects other emerging markets through what is known as 'pure' contagion.…”
Section: Risk Tolerance and Credit Rationing In The Market For Em Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar and Persaud (2001) suggest how this might be done, by arguing that observed spreads should not be explained in terms of the difference between global risk (α) and the variance of the asset price (σ 2 ) as is conventionally done, but rather the product of risk appetite (K) and the standard deviation of the asset price (P). This in turn defines the expected return E(R), which is measured as the difference between the long-term asset price LR(P) and the current price P.…”
Section: Push Factors and Credit Cycles -The Macroeconomic Dimension mentioning
confidence: 99%