2019
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980019000375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purchasing patterns in low-income neighbourhoods: implications for studying sugar-sweetened beverage taxes

Abstract: Objective. The present study aimed to determine the store types from which people in low-income neighborhoods purchase most sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and to identify associations between purchasing location and demographic characteristics. Design. Street intercept surveys of passers-by near high foot-traffic intersections in 2016. Participants completed a beverage frequency questionnaire and identified the type of store (e.g., corner store, chain grocery) from which they purchased most SSBs. Setting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, a recent policy evaluation [13] suggests excise taxes may be one effective tool in reducing purchases at these unique sites. At the same time, with many low-income communities relying on these outlets for their food and beverage needs [29,51] and our results showing distinct patterns by socioeconomic resources, it remains important to understand beverage purchasing as both a health and equity issue. Addressing the historical and social conditions that place marginalized communities at increased risk for SSB purchasing and limited water selections, including those at convenience stores, will be essential to improve population health as well as health equity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fortunately, a recent policy evaluation [13] suggests excise taxes may be one effective tool in reducing purchases at these unique sites. At the same time, with many low-income communities relying on these outlets for their food and beverage needs [29,51] and our results showing distinct patterns by socioeconomic resources, it remains important to understand beverage purchasing as both a health and equity issue. Addressing the historical and social conditions that place marginalized communities at increased risk for SSB purchasing and limited water selections, including those at convenience stores, will be essential to improve population health as well as health equity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Convenience and other small food stores, such as corner stores, gas-marts, and dollar stores, are frequent venues for SSB purchasing [26][27][28], and research suggests these are key SSB purchasing outlets for low-income communities [29]. However, objective purchase data from convenience and other small food stores are often difficult to capture for two important reasons [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…processed meats), the decrease has been small, while disparities in sugar have widened. More research is needed to understand to what extent these disparities in healthy and unhealthy foods are related to access, such as the types of food stores and quality of their PFP in low-v. high-income areas (59)(60)(61) or whether households participating in food assistance programmes have access to eligible stores, which have minimum stocking requirements for healthy foods (62) . Changing the environment inside stores is a potential strategy to reduce disparitiesin one study, small, inexpensive packs of fruits and vegetables near checkout were purchased more by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants than the average shopper (63) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Percentage of the population whose income is below the poverty line (Friedline et al 2019;LaValley et al 2019;Lee et al 2018;Maguire-Jack and Font 2017;Mugoya et al 2017;Prakash et al 2017;Slain et al 2018). • Median household income is below the national median level (Chen 2019;Child et al 2019;Cohen et al 2018;Madsen et al 2019;Reboussin et al 2016;Wang et al 2018). • Average household income is in the lowest quartile (Kleinepier and van Ham 2018;Müller et al 2016).…”
Section: Operationalisation Of Deprived Communities Using One Variablementioning
confidence: 99%