1980
DOI: 10.1016/0364-6408(80)90038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purchase and use of monographs originally requested on interlibrary loan in a medical school library

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A quick glance at the library literature suggests that publications that explicitly identify or from which one may infer circulation correlates are fairly common. As has the PDA literature, many of the studies on circulation and use-both classic and current-have found relationships between circulation/use and books' selectors (Davidson 1943;Ellis et al 2010;Evans 1970;Hardesty 1981;Pritchard 1980;Tucker 2009). A sizeable amount of research has also concluded or implied that relationships exist between circulation/ use and books' subjects or Library of Congress (LC) classifications (Adams and Noel 2008;Aguilar 1986;Blecic 2000;Britten 1990;Bulick, Sabor, and Flynn 1979;Davidson 1943;Ellis et al 2010;Fenske 1994;Fussler and Simon 1969;Grigg et al 2010;Knievel, Wicht, and Connaway 2006;Lancaster 1982;Lotlikar 1997;Mills 1982;Mouyal 2005;Ochola 2002;Peasgood 1986;Tucker 2009).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A quick glance at the library literature suggests that publications that explicitly identify or from which one may infer circulation correlates are fairly common. As has the PDA literature, many of the studies on circulation and use-both classic and current-have found relationships between circulation/use and books' selectors (Davidson 1943;Ellis et al 2010;Evans 1970;Hardesty 1981;Pritchard 1980;Tucker 2009). A sizeable amount of research has also concluded or implied that relationships exist between circulation/ use and books' subjects or Library of Congress (LC) classifications (Adams and Noel 2008;Aguilar 1986;Blecic 2000;Britten 1990;Bulick, Sabor, and Flynn 1979;Davidson 1943;Ellis et al 2010;Fenske 1994;Fussler and Simon 1969;Grigg et al 2010;Knievel, Wicht, and Connaway 2006;Lancaster 1982;Lotlikar 1997;Mills 1982;Mouyal 2005;Ochola 2002;Peasgood 1986;Tucker 2009).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the answer would appear to be that the PDA literature has failed to address this complexity. In reporting their results, many PDA studies have merely offered the reader the number or percentage of PDA books that have circulated, sometimes with figures for traditionally acquired books included for purposes of comparison and sometimes not (Allen et al 2003;Anderson et al 2002;Brug and MacWaters 2004;Campbell 2006;Crane 2011;Houle 2004;Perdue and Van Fleet 1999;Pritchard 1980;Reynolds et al 2010;Teaff 2011;Ward 2002;Ward et al 2003;Way 2009;Zopfi-Jordan 2008). Other studies have additionally offered the numbers or percentages of PDA books that have experienced multiple circulations (Allen et al 2003;Anderson et al 2002;Bombeld and Hanerfeld 2004;Brug and MacWaters 2004;Chan 2004;Houle 2004;Ward et al 2003) or numbers of circulations subsequent to the books' having been returned to the library shelves by their initial ILL requestors (Comer and Lorenzen 2005;Nixon and Saunders 2010;Way 2009).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…G. E. Evans et al [4] also proposed a model to investigate the use of library books based on the personal history of selected books in several libraries. S.Pritchard et al [5] also investigated the future use of the library books based on the manner of selection. All of the previous work is based on the classification book-loan records according to various attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evans [3] investigated the numbers of loans for books classified by the person who had selected the book, academic staff, library staff, and book jobbers, in some academic libraries. Pritchard [4] also investigated the frequencies of loans for books selected on the basis of four criteria, new editions of already held books, requests on interlibrary loan, recommendations by library staff, and recommendations by academic staff. As for Japanese university libraries, Matsui and Isono [5] investigated the turnover rate of books in the library of Nara University, and found the typical change over the years (obsolescence) on the frequency of loans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%