2012
DOI: 10.1364/oe.20.007901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purcell effect in photonic crystal microcavities embedding InAs/InP quantum wires

Abstract: Abstract:The spontaneous emission rate and Purcell factor of selfassembled quantum wires embedded in photonic crystal micro-cavities are measured at 80 K by using micro-photoluminescence, under transient and steady state excitation conditions. The Purcell factors fall in the range 1.1 -2 despite the theoretical prediction of ≈15.5 for the figure of merit. We explain this difference by introducing a polarization dependence on the cavity orientation, parallel or perpendicular with respect to the wire axis, plus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Purcell factor drops by a factor of 10 when the dot is only about 150 nm away from the field maximum (Supplement 4). In addition, the polarization mismatch between dots and cavities further reduces the Purcell factor [44]. These imperfect spatial and polarization matches cause the discrepancy between the calculated and measured Purcell effect, and explains why some dots have negligible Purcell effect even at near zero spectral detuning in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Purcell factor drops by a factor of 10 when the dot is only about 150 nm away from the field maximum (Supplement 4). In addition, the polarization mismatch between dots and cavities further reduces the Purcell factor [44]. These imperfect spatial and polarization matches cause the discrepancy between the calculated and measured Purcell effect, and explains why some dots have negligible Purcell effect even at near zero spectral detuning in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the homogeneous linewidth is rather large, these QDs fulfill some basic demands mostly when an accurate control of the emitter position is required, as for example photonic devices based on the spatial tuning of Purcell effect. 14,20 Finally, we have measured the energy splitting of the excited states to be compared with the neutral exciton energy. The existence of a level structure with well-defined P-states and the possibility of charge injection through the nominally forbidden transition promise a better control of the optical feeding, polarization and spin manipulation in our SCQDs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In our case, we also expect a background contribution from QWRs poorly coupled to the lasing mode of the PCM. 24 To evaluate the influence of the stimulated emission in the dependence of the decay times on the excitation power, we have compared time resolved measurements of lasing and nonlasing modes from different PCMs at nearly equal wavelengths. Figure 3 Fig.…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The QWRs exhibit a broad emission and optical absorption, spatial, and spectral detuning resulting in a measured PF not larger than 3. 10,24,25 This value of PF provides a weak coupling regime at the same time than lasing, which makes our system especially suitable for PE studies on lasing modes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%