2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00008.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pupils' recall of an interactive storybook on CD‐ROM

Abstract: This small-scale study compares two groups of Year 4 (8/9 year-old) pupils either reading or playing an interactive storybook. The study considered pupils' recall of propositions, which formed the story setting and episodes, and of micro-propositions and characters' names, and pupils' responses to inferential items derived from the 'interactive storybook'. The study indicates that, whether reading or playing, pupils' recall of the story setting was sound, but pupils who had read the interactive storybook demon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(17 reference statements)
3
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The results would suggest that there is a comparison between accessing CASE and a poor recall of the story line. This is consistent with the findings of Trushell et al, 2003, andMedwell, 1999. Hypothesis one, 'Children will be more highly motivated to use a talking story than a conventional text' can be accepted because the participants showed high levels of motivation and enjoyment for wanting to read talking stories more than conventional books. This complements the findings of Underwood, 2000, who found that talking stories were highly motivating to children.…”
Section: Bprs Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results would suggest that there is a comparison between accessing CASE and a poor recall of the story line. This is consistent with the findings of Trushell et al, 2003, andMedwell, 1999. Hypothesis one, 'Children will be more highly motivated to use a talking story than a conventional text' can be accepted because the participants showed high levels of motivation and enjoyment for wanting to read talking stories more than conventional books. This complements the findings of Underwood, 2000, who found that talking stories were highly motivating to children.…”
Section: Bprs Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The most recent researchers in the area of talking books are Underwood, 2000, andTrushell et al, 2003. In two separate studies, they investigated whether diversions such as CASE affected pupils' comprehension of a storybook. The main finding of Trushell et ars research was that the more intensive the choice when clicking CASE, the more poorly a child performed on multiple choice questions.…”
Section: Bprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Okolo and Hays found that the low comprehension levels of poor second grade readers who used CD-ROM storybooks resulted from inconsistencies between the animations and the story line in the ebooks. In another study, fourth graders who read an interactive e-book recalled the story's events structure better than those who were engaged in the e-book's play version (Truschell et al 2003). Based on two recent content analysis studies of e-books for young children, one carried out in Holland with Dutch e-storybooks (De Jong and Bus 2003) and the other in Israel with Hebrew e-books (Korat and Shamir 2004), it might be suggested that most of the software currently available for children aged 3-8 is not very satisfactory as a tool for supporting literacy (for a more detailed description see Shamir 2004 andKorat 2006).…”
Section: Electronic Booksmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Trushell, Maitland, and Burrell (2003) investigated the extent to which interactive, cued animation and sound effects (CASE, or hotspots) may detract from children's understanding of the story structure and recall. In a quasi-experimental study, groups of students were assigned to either a Let me play group, which used an interactive e-book with hotspot animations and sound effects, or a Read to me group, which used the same e-book with these interactive features turned off and only a point-and-click word and line pronunciation option available.…”
Section: E-books For Story Comprehension-mentioning
confidence: 99%