2003
DOI: 10.1136/pmj.79.927.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pupillary evaluation for differential diagnosis of coma

Abstract: Objectives: To determine the usefulness of bedside evaluation of pupils in determining the aetiology of coma by adopting a probabilistic approach. Patients and methods: One hundred and fifteen consecutive patients presenting with coma were enrolled in this prospective cohort during the 12 month study period in the emergency room of a community teaching hospital. Patients underwent structured clinical examinations and laboratory and imaging tests. Assignment of aetiology of coma was based on strict adherence to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[7] Thus, a better understanding of causes and outcome, especially in a resource poor setting, is key to improving the approach and to plan rational management of medical coma. Moreover, since knowledge of disease probability is crucial in terms of differential diagnosis, [8,9] relative frequency of various causes of coma should be investigated in an actual cohort.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7] Thus, a better understanding of causes and outcome, especially in a resource poor setting, is key to improving the approach and to plan rational management of medical coma. Moreover, since knowledge of disease probability is crucial in terms of differential diagnosis, [8,9] relative frequency of various causes of coma should be investigated in an actual cohort.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative frequency of various causes of coma in our patients was similar to previous report outside Nigeria in spite of the geographic and technological differences. [9][10][11] However, when the etiological factors were considered individually, stroke appeared the most common cause. This finding agrees with the report of Obiako and his colleagues in southwestern Nigeria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has reported the prevalence of PAs in this population. Our findings should be cautiously compared with those from previous studies that almost uniquely included neurosurgical patients (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). The prevalence of PAs may vary according to the quality of the pupillary evaluation, which can be challenging at the bedside (2,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The size and reactivity to light of each pupil allows an exploration of brainstem function and should be recorded periodically in intensive care units (ICU) (2)(3)(4). Indeed, pupillary abnormalities (PAs), i.e., anisocoria and/or pupillary areflexia, may represent a sign of acute brain damage, which is particularly informative in comatose patients (1)(2)(3)(4). In neurosurgical patients, PAs are frequent and represent a reliable marker of brain herniation or ischemia (5)(6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La caracterís-tica diferencial de un coma tóxico es la disociación de los hallazgos físicos esperados, por ejemplo, un reflejo pupilar a la luz intacto en ausencia de respuesta oculovestibular y motora 19,20 . Este fenómeno de disociación es explicado porque varias funciones del tallo cerebral tienden a ser más vulnerables a la agresión tóxica y metabólica que los reflejos pupilares a la luz 21,22 . Dentro de las excepciones para considerar están la intoxicación por opioides, barbitúricos y amitraz que producen miosis puntiforme no reactiva, mientras que algunos agentes anticolinérgicos causan midriasis no reactiva como en Tabla 2.…”
Section: Manejo En El Servicio De Urgenciasunclassified