2018
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00290.2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pupil-linked arousal modulates behavior in rats performing a whisker deflection direction discrimination task

Abstract: Non-luminance-mediated changes in pupil size have been widely used to index arousal state. Recent animal studies have demonstrated correlations between behavioral state-related pupil dynamics and sensory processing. However, the relationship between pupil-linked arousal and behavior in animals performing perceptual tasks has not been fully elucidated. In the present study, we trained head-fixed rats to discriminate between directions of whisker movements using a Go/No-Go discrimination paradigm while imaging t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

17
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(130 reference statements)
17
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we show that tonic, baseline pupil size depends on the speed‐accuracy trade‐off set by the participant per trial. These effects are in line with previous findings by studies with humans (Murphy, Boonstra, et al, ; Naber et al, ) and rodents (Schriver, Bagdasarov, & Wang, ) and suggest that the pupil's sensitivity adjustments in the speed‐accuracy trade‐off is not limited to a specific task context. Aside from this finding, several other aspects of our results warrant further consideration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…First, we show that tonic, baseline pupil size depends on the speed‐accuracy trade‐off set by the participant per trial. These effects are in line with previous findings by studies with humans (Murphy, Boonstra, et al, ; Naber et al, ) and rodents (Schriver, Bagdasarov, & Wang, ) and suggest that the pupil's sensitivity adjustments in the speed‐accuracy trade‐off is not limited to a specific task context. Aside from this finding, several other aspects of our results warrant further consideration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This result supports the model that phasic neuromodulatory signals that occur naturally are strongest during intermediate levels of tonic neuromodulatory activity (Aston-Jones and Cohen, 2005). This model is further supported by recent observations that tonic arousal predicts nonmonotonic (inverted U) changes in the signal-to-noise ratio of sensory cortical responses and perceptual sensitivity (McGinley et al, 2015a;Schriver et al, 2018;Waschke et al, 2019). Note that we observed the inverted U relationship after correcting for a general reversion to mean.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the accumulating evidence suggests that perceptual decision is also significantly affected by latent subjective states reflecting task engagement 8 . For instance, behavioral response variability is correlated with mind wondering in humans 9 and fluctuations of physiological and behavioral states in animals [10][11][12][13] . These drifts of subjective states could be partially attributed to the fluctuation of cortical states [13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%