2016
DOI: 10.1364/ol.41.001205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pupil filters for extending the field-of-view in light-sheet microscopy

Abstract: Pupil filters, represented by binary phase modulation, have been applied to extend the field of view of a light-sheet fluorescence microscope. Optimization has been used, first numerically to calculate the optimum filter structure and then experimentally, to scale and align the numerically synthesized filter in the microscope. A significant practical extension of the field of view has been observed, making the reported approach a valuable tool on the path to wide-field light-sheet microscopy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum stroke of the MAL limits the maximum amplitudes of the modes, hence the exploration parameters and bounds for each mode should be carefully chosen. Previously, DONE has successfully been used in WFSL-AO OCT, light sheet microscopy, and simulations of an optical beam forming network [29,38,47]. It was shown that DONE outperforms other algorithms in residual wavefront error and convergence speed [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum stroke of the MAL limits the maximum amplitudes of the modes, hence the exploration parameters and bounds for each mode should be carefully chosen. Previously, DONE has successfully been used in WFSL-AO OCT, light sheet microscopy, and simulations of an optical beam forming network [29,38,47]. It was shown that DONE outperforms other algorithms in residual wavefront error and convergence speed [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of additional innovations extended the imaging resolution and 3D field of view for diverse applications of light-sheet microscopy. These improvements included varying the in-plane propagation direction of the light sheet to reduce striping (Huisken & Stainier 2007); beam shaping and adaptive optics (Dalgarno et al 2012, Lindek et al 1996, Royer et al 2016, Wilding et al 2016; and the use of Bessel beams (Fahrbach & Rohrbach 2010, Planchon et al 2011, Airy beams (Vettenburg et al 2014), lattice sheets (Chen et al 2014), beam-waist scanning (Dean et al 2015), two-photon excitation (Lavagnino et al 2013, Truong et al 2011, structured illumination (Keller et al 2010, Mertz & Kim 2010, and nonlinear photoactivation (Cella . Additional methods have incorporated deconvolution and computational reconstruction of multiple projections to yield higher isotropic resolution (Chhetri et al 2015, Wu et al 2016, although the routine deconvolution of large, high-speed data sets remains very computationally demanding.…”
Section: Improvements To Sample Geometries and Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pupil function is real valued ±1 and therefore, the solution is symmetric along the optical axis and in the orthogonal directions. These pupil filters are found by a two-stage optimization procedure 22…”
Section: Light-sheet Shapingmentioning
confidence: 99%