2011
DOI: 10.5130/portal.v8i1.1741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Punk Rock and the Value of Auto-ethnographic Writing about Music

Abstract: Why do many of the books on punk rock and hardcore punk come with punk attitude? Why are a good number of the books written from a personal perspective? What kind of value do the diary entries of Nils Stevenson in 'Vacant: A Diary of the Punk Years 1976-79' have compared to an article on the rhetoric of class by David Simonelli in the journal 'Contemporary British History'? In some respects scholarly writing on punk rock seems like a contradiction. How can music so rooted in anti-establishment sentiment be app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My personal music-making in nature – for myself and my own sense of well-being – models key aspects of DIY culture, such as deliberate isolation (Quigley and Smith, 2021) and music-making for non-commercial (Smith and Gillett, 2015); this is musicking I am doing by myself (at least from an anthropocentric point of view) and for myself. This autoethnographic paper is a continuation of that DIY ethos, as a process of reflection on personal practice in writing (Attfield, 2011; Stephens-Griffin and Griffin, 2019). The improvised, woodland drumming described in this article also provides examples of DIY learning, construed as part of a punk pedagogical practice (Lee and Smith, 2023; Smith et al, 2022; Torrez, 2012) wherein I ascribe what Bourdieu and Passeron (1977) term ‘pedagogic authority’ to nature and the environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…My personal music-making in nature – for myself and my own sense of well-being – models key aspects of DIY culture, such as deliberate isolation (Quigley and Smith, 2021) and music-making for non-commercial (Smith and Gillett, 2015); this is musicking I am doing by myself (at least from an anthropocentric point of view) and for myself. This autoethnographic paper is a continuation of that DIY ethos, as a process of reflection on personal practice in writing (Attfield, 2011; Stephens-Griffin and Griffin, 2019). The improvised, woodland drumming described in this article also provides examples of DIY learning, construed as part of a punk pedagogical practice (Lee and Smith, 2023; Smith et al, 2022; Torrez, 2012) wherein I ascribe what Bourdieu and Passeron (1977) term ‘pedagogic authority’ to nature and the environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Apart from the controversies, the impact of autoethnography is understandable given the flexibility of the method in embracing not only individual but also collective contexts (including Doğantan-Dack, 2012;Armstrong & Desbruslais, 2014;Sutherland, 2015) across different musical genres -from Western art music (Benetti, 2017) and pop (Kennett, 2008), to jazz and blues (Spry, 2010), punk rock and hardcore rock (Attfield, 2011). Furthermore, contemporary forms of recording, documenting and disseminating have become attractive to researchers due to the needs arising from the artistic nature of the object of scientific study, such as audio-collage and creative writing (narrative fiction, creative non-fiction, ethnodrama, poetry) (Wiley, 2019).…”
Section: Autoethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%