1970
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5702.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Punishment or treatment: prison or hospital?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Super-ego and conscience are developed through parental influence and the reasonable parentalism of staff is vital to the treatment of those who have been damaged by parental figures. These themes were clearly expressed by the forensic psychiatrist Peter Scott (1970):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Super-ego and conscience are developed through parental influence and the reasonable parentalism of staff is vital to the treatment of those who have been damaged by parental figures. These themes were clearly expressed by the forensic psychiatrist Peter Scott (1970):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Security itself may be seen in a therapeutic context, both in terms of therapy improving (relational) security, 6 and safe containment being essential for treatment. 6,7 The use of leave, too, is inherently therapeutic in secure hospital units and the means by which otherwise sterile risk assessments are gradually tested out in a controlled fashion, something alien to the culture of the closed prison system. Patients are encouraged gradually to resume responsibility for their behaviour and they demonstrate that by adhering to the boundaries of leave.…”
Section: Security V Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But at a much later date physically unpleasant methods -what Reil (1803) called 'non-injurious torture' -were still seriously advocated as a means of bringing a patient under control or to his senses. In fact, as Scott (1970) has pointed out, punishment and treatment are not the opposites that they seem to be. Whether in operant conditioning, or in the institutional management of the socially disordered, some form of punishment is inescapable, but must be applied in accordance with clearly stated principles and not out of a personal vindictiveness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Whether in operant conditioning, or in the institutional management of the socially disordered, some form of punishment is inescapable, but must be applied in accordance with clearly stated principles and not out of a personal vindictiveness. However, 'it is easy and unhappily gratifying to punish wicked people and, if they turn nasty, lock them up and go home to your tea' (Scott, 1970). The use of treatment as punishment is particularly tempting to those who deal with violent patients, and who may be attacked by them: retaliation is an understandable reaction, as has already been acknowledged (Davies, 1973;Watkins, 1971).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%