2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Punishment in the form of shared cost promotes altruism in the cooperative dilemma games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Avoiding second-order free riding by introducing an entrance fee was analyzed in [15]. A set of the cooperators was randomly selected to perform as punishers in [27], the cost of punishing was shared between cooperators in [28], and a ceiling payoff for defectors was introduced to promote cooperation in [29,30].…”
Section: Sanctioning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avoiding second-order free riding by introducing an entrance fee was analyzed in [15]. A set of the cooperators was randomly selected to perform as punishers in [27], the cost of punishing was shared between cooperators in [28], and a ceiling payoff for defectors was introduced to promote cooperation in [29,30].…”
Section: Sanctioning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One direction to explore is how the cost is born. Instances include those where cost are not only undertaken by the punishers, but also by those from higher hierarchies, the third party, or even cooperators 47 , 60 . Another way to consider is the punishment not always implemented, such as the coordination of punishment or the probabilistic execution 30 , 61 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%