2008
DOI: 10.1097/01.nurse.0000341082.06448.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Puncturing myths about body piercing and tattooing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proactively removing jewelry before diagnostic procedures or surgery saves the patient from a potential adverse event and encourages safe practice. A practice recommended by the American Academy of Dermatology is to use nonmetallic retainers or catheters to keep the pierced tract open during surgery, or to cover with a clear occlusive dressing before a procedure (American Academy of Dermatology, 2004;DeBoer, Seaver, Angel, & Armstrong, 2008).…”
Section: To Remove or Not To Removementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proactively removing jewelry before diagnostic procedures or surgery saves the patient from a potential adverse event and encourages safe practice. A practice recommended by the American Academy of Dermatology is to use nonmetallic retainers or catheters to keep the pierced tract open during surgery, or to cover with a clear occlusive dressing before a procedure (American Academy of Dermatology, 2004;DeBoer, Seaver, Angel, & Armstrong, 2008).…”
Section: To Remove or Not To Removementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a wider academic context, 'myth' appears to be predominantly used in this latter meaning, as 'false idea', and often rather derogatorily: In titles of research articles myths are not merely falsified, rejected, or corrected, they are quite violently 'broken' (Rakover, 1986); 'busted' (Malhotra, Noakes, & Phinney, 2015); 'shattered' (Baird & Gangl, 2006); 'exploded' (Wiley & Harnischfeger, 1974); and 'punctured' (DeBoer, Seaver, Angel, & Armstrong, 2008).…”
Section: Acquiesced and Unrefuted: The Growth Of Scientific Mythsmentioning
confidence: 99%