Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.14359/51702134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Punching Shear Behavior of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer–Reinforced Concrete Slab-Column Interior Connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six specimens with a footprint of 2 m × 2 m, a depth of 0.15 m, cast with a 0.25 m × 0.25 m square column stub also 0.15 m deep were built. The specimen dimensions correspond to realistic construction dimensions and are in line with other experimental research in the area such as [3 , 4] . The experimental scheme and instrumentation is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Six specimens with a footprint of 2 m × 2 m, a depth of 0.15 m, cast with a 0.25 m × 0.25 m square column stub also 0.15 m deep were built. The specimen dimensions correspond to realistic construction dimensions and are in line with other experimental research in the area such as [3 , 4] . The experimental scheme and instrumentation is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…A. H. Hussein, et al [5] performed an experimental research on six fullscale slabs with interior column connections to investigate two types of glass fiber reinforced polymer as a punching shear reinforcement (headed studs or corrugated bars) when ordinary strength concrete was used. They concluded that both headed studs and corrugated bars increased the punching capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimen and column dimensions, loading points and eight CFRP rows around loading column are shown in Figure 19. Hussein and El-Salakawy [41] concluded that increasing the flexural tension GFRP reinforcement ratio of high-strength flat slab (80 MPa) from 1% to 1.5% (50% increase) increases the punching shear strength by 15%, while increasing the reinforcement ratio to 2% (100% increases) increases the punching shear strength by 27%. The longitudinal GFRP tension reinforcement was No.…”
Section: Figure 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normal-strength flat slab set tested for the effect of GFRP shear reinforcement consisted of one control specimen without shear reinforcement, a second specimen reinforced with GFRP shear studs, and a third specimen reinforcement with corrugated GFRP shear reinforcement as seen in Figure 20. The study Hussein and El-Salakawy [41] concluded that increasing the flexural tension GFRP reinforcement ratio of high-strength flat slab (80 MPa) from 1% to 1.5% (50% increase) increases the punching shear strength by 15%, while increasing the reinforcement ratio to 2% (100% increases) increases the punching shear strength by 27%. The longitudinal GFRP tension reinforcement was No.…”
Section: Figure 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation