2017
DOI: 10.35789/fib.bull.0081.ch13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Punching of flat slabs under reversed horizontal cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such test setups have been commonly accepted and used as good and simple representatives of slab–column connections. However, they use simplified boundary conditions, such as borders that are free of bending moments and vertically fixed, which lead to a static position of the zero‐moment line and the inability to have bending moment redistribution . To overcome some of these limitations, a different test setup has been developed at Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (DEC/FCT/UNL) .…”
Section: Experimental Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such test setups have been commonly accepted and used as good and simple representatives of slab–column connections. However, they use simplified boundary conditions, such as borders that are free of bending moments and vertically fixed, which lead to a static position of the zero‐moment line and the inability to have bending moment redistribution . To overcome some of these limitations, a different test setup has been developed at Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (DEC/FCT/UNL) .…”
Section: Experimental Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they use simplified boundary conditions, such as borders that are free of bending moments and vertically fixed, which lead to a static position of the zero‐moment line and the inability to have bending moment redistribution . To overcome some of these limitations, a different test setup has been developed at Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (DEC/FCT/UNL) . This setup allows vertical displacements at the slab borders; equal magnitude of shear forces, bending moments and rotations at the slab borders; mobility of the line of inflection location along the longitudinal direction and the possibility of applying high vertical load ratios.…”
Section: Experimental Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences described in the previous paragraphs are visible in Figure 6a, resulting in a wide range of ultimate drift ratios between 1.5 and 6.5% for GSR between 0.2 and 0.35. Figure 6a,b compare the results obtained in the tests described in this paper (Figure 6a) with those of the database of isolated slab‐column connections analyzed by Ramos et al, 35 figure 6b. In both sets of results, for GSR between 0.2 and 0.35 the values of ultimate drift are in the range 1.5–6%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This experimental work was developed using a test setup that models the boundary conditions of the flat slab at half spans, allowing the redistribution of bending moments and the migration of the inflection point as well as controlling the vertical movement by impose equal displacements of the supported borders to simulate the behaviour of the real slab. This test setup had already been used by the research team and proved to be efficient for what it was designed, as can be seen in (Almeida et al, 2016), (Ramos et al, 2017) and (Gouveia et al, 2017). For the detailing of the shear reinforcement, variations were made in the amount of steel reinforcement in each layer and in the number of used layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%