2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(01)00071-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Punching behavior of biaxial hollow slabs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These reduction levels registered in the BD series are in agreement with the values obtained by other researcher. 4 The average deflection at peak load was larger in the SS series, and no tendency was registered in terms of the influence of the precast RC floor plates for the slab's deformability. Figure 11 shows that up to about ≈740 kN (and ≈10 mm deflection) the load versus average deflection was almost coincident in all the tested slabs, and the loss of stiffness T A B L E 3 Load carrying capacity and deflection performance of the tested slabs Figure 10c shows the locations where the strain gauges were placed on the slab's bottom concrete surface for measuring the radial (CRS) and circumferential (CCS) strains.…”
Section: Load Carrying and Deflection Capacitiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These reduction levels registered in the BD series are in agreement with the values obtained by other researcher. 4 The average deflection at peak load was larger in the SS series, and no tendency was registered in terms of the influence of the precast RC floor plates for the slab's deformability. Figure 11 shows that up to about ≈740 kN (and ≈10 mm deflection) the load versus average deflection was almost coincident in all the tested slabs, and the loss of stiffness T A B L E 3 Load carrying capacity and deflection performance of the tested slabs Figure 10c shows the locations where the strain gauges were placed on the slab's bottom concrete surface for measuring the radial (CRS) and circumferential (CCS) strains.…”
Section: Load Carrying and Deflection Capacitiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Some research has been carried out on the effect of BubbleDeck on the shear capacity. From experimental tests carried out by [3] and cited by [1] on full-scale BubbleDeck slabs and comparison to theoretical calculations for solid slab, they observed a reduction in shear capacity of up to 40 %. While extensive research exists on each of the key research areas outlined above, very little literature has been published relating to location of BubbleDeck and their effect on shear connections.…”
Section: Composite Steel-concrete Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural System with Voided Biaxial Slabs. The voided biaxial reinforced concrete slab, constructed using prefabricated voided modules and cast in situ reinforced concrete, has gained wide attention since its emergence as a new structural system [6][7][8][9][10]. These ecofriendly voided biaxial slabs have many advantages over conventional solid concrete slabs, such as lower total cost, reduced material use, enhanced structural efficiency, and decreased construction time, that have contributed to their wide application in civil construction.…”
Section: Voided Biaxial Slab-based Tuned Rollingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, this is achieved by laying less heavy material, such as polystyrene or polypropylene made hollow modules between the reinforcement of beams/ribbed beams, and thus displacing concrete with less structural benefit. A typical technology used in Europe is the so-called "BubbleDeck" biaxial voided slab [9,10], in which spherical hollow modules composed of recycled industrial plastic are used, allowing the hollow slab to act as a normal monolithic two-way spanning concrete slab. For another form of hollow module, see the "Uboot" [7] technology, as an example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%