2015
DOI: 10.1159/000430459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pump Up the Volume: Could Excessive Neural Gain Explain Tinnitus and Hyperacusis?

Abstract: Naturally occurring stimuli can vary over several orders of magnitude and may exceed the dynamic range of sensory neurons. As a result, sensory systems adapt their sensitivity by changing their responsiveness or ‘gain'. While many peripheral adaptation processes are rapid, slow adaptation processes have been observed in response to sensory deprivation or elevated stimulation. This adaptation process alters neural gain in order to adjust the basic operating point of sensory processing. In the auditory system, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with recent reports showing central gain enhancement with various forms of cochlear pathology; however, an unusual feature of carboplatin is that hearing thresholds are largely unaffected by the cochlea pathology (Salvi et al, 1990, 2000b; Sun et al, 2009; Stolzberg et al, 2011; Yuan et al, 2014; Brotherton et al, 2015; Chen et al, 2016). Interestingly, similar perceptual and electrophysiological changes were observed in a recent study examining ouabain treatment in mice, which selectively destroys type-1 SGN (Chambers et al, 2016).…”
Section: Central Gain Compensates For Auditory Deprivationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These findings are consistent with recent reports showing central gain enhancement with various forms of cochlear pathology; however, an unusual feature of carboplatin is that hearing thresholds are largely unaffected by the cochlea pathology (Salvi et al, 1990, 2000b; Sun et al, 2009; Stolzberg et al, 2011; Yuan et al, 2014; Brotherton et al, 2015; Chen et al, 2016). Interestingly, similar perceptual and electrophysiological changes were observed in a recent study examining ouabain treatment in mice, which selectively destroys type-1 SGN (Chambers et al, 2016).…”
Section: Central Gain Compensates For Auditory Deprivationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Answers to the two screening questions for hyperacusis (Schecklmann et al, 2015) were significantly related to speech comprehension in the cocktail party situation, but not to speech comprehension in general. As hyperacusis is presumably due to increased central gain as a consequence of deficient central inhibitory mechanisms (Brotherton et al, 2015), our findings suggest that this inhibitory dysfunction of the auditory pathway has a specific impact on speech comprehension difficulties in the cocktail party situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Optimum sensitivity was achieved with high modulation frequencies (∼1 kHz), which limited the influence of more central nuclei. In contrast, the present study used a much lower modulation frequency and likely elicited the responses of higher centers, where the effects of deafferentation might be mitigated by enhanced central gain (Brotherton et al., 2015, Chambers et al., 2016). Hence the present EFR amplitude data must be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%