2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.3701724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pump-probe scanning near field optical microscopy: Sub-wavelength resolution chemical imaging and ultrafast local dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equation is particularly useful in experiments where the focus spot size of the pump beam is much bigger than the probe, like we are using here. When the probe focus is comparable to the pump, the bleach signal samples nano-particles that are excited with different intensities and the signals due to single and multi-excitons get averaged19. In this case a more generalized approach may be useful9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation is particularly useful in experiments where the focus spot size of the pump beam is much bigger than the probe, like we are using here. When the probe focus is comparable to the pump, the bleach signal samples nano-particles that are excited with different intensities and the signals due to single and multi-excitons get averaged19. In this case a more generalized approach may be useful9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for a rigorous calculation of the MEG yield we need to evaluate the proper scaling factor that relates the populations to the signal's amplitude. When the experiments are performed under the condition of uniform illumination of the probed sample's volume by the pump pulse [107], the scaling factors can also be computed from the pump-probe measurements themselves, following the procedure outlined by Karki et al [104] Figure 9(a) shows the pump-probe signal of PbSe nanorods at short temporal delay (S(t 0 )), before 15 ps (blue points), and long temporal delay (S(t l )), after 800 ps (red points), when the sample is excited with femtosecond pulses. The band-gap of the nanorods is about 1 eV, and the energy of the excitation photons is about 1.6 eV.…”
Section: Multiple Exciton Generation (Meg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major drawback of this technique is that it does not deliver information about the orientation of polymer chains inside crystallites and the local degree of order. [24,25] Additional information, e.g., about the angle between transition dipole moment and polymer backbone, can be extracted by Raman spectroscopy, which can be combined with SNOM. [19][20][21] These techniques allow spatially averaged insights into the overall orientation of polymer chains and the overall degree of order in the sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, AFM investigations are often combined with scattering techniques such as grazing-incidence X-ray scattering (GIXS), [12][13][14][15][16] resonant soft-X-ray scattering (R-SoXS), [12,13,17] or small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), [18] or with polarization-dependent absorption techniques such as near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS). [24,25] Additional information, e.g., about the angle between transition dipole moment and polymer backbone, can be extracted by Raman spectroscopy, which can be combined with SNOM. Other techniques to characterize semicrystalline films of organic semiconductors comprise polarized optical microscopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%