2007
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2006-10433-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pump-probe measurement of atomic parity violation in cesium with a precision of 2.6%

Abstract: We present the atomic parity violation measurements made in Cs vapour using a pump-probe scheme. After pulsed excitation of the 6S-7S forbidden transition in the presence of a longitudinal electric field, a laser beam resonant with one of the 7S-6P transitions stimulates the 7S atom emission for a duration of 20 ns. The polarisation of the amplified probe beam is analysed. A seven-fold signature allows discrimination of the parity violating linear dichroism, and real-time calibration by a similar, known, parit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the conventional selection rules ( 1 l    and 0 s   ) which are derived from the Schrödinger equation in the same way as in Section 3, a transition such as 6s 7s  is not allowed ( because this is a transition ( 0 l   0 l  ) in which 0 l   , so it does not meet the condition 1 l    ). But 6s 7s  transition in Cs atom has been already observed [7][8][9]. However, the present spin dependent selection rules allow the transition: 6s   7s  in Cs atom.…”
Section: Application Of the Spin Dependent Selection Rules To (  6s mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the conventional selection rules ( 1 l    and 0 s   ) which are derived from the Schrödinger equation in the same way as in Section 3, a transition such as 6s 7s  is not allowed ( because this is a transition ( 0 l   0 l  ) in which 0 l   , so it does not meet the condition 1 l    ). But 6s 7s  transition in Cs atom has been already observed [7][8][9]. However, the present spin dependent selection rules allow the transition: 6s   7s  in Cs atom.…”
Section: Application Of the Spin Dependent Selection Rules To (  6s mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…By applying the present spin dependent selection rules we can explain the observed (6 s  7 s) transition in Cesium (Cs) atom [7,8]. Because in the (6s  7s) transition in Cesium (Cs) atom we have [ 0 j   while 0 j m   ] which is an allowed transition according to the present selection rules given in Equation (28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus the difference in the angle of the polarisation plane rotation is ∆α ℓ ≈ 4πℓ × 10 −5 . This is a small angle, yet by no means beyond current experimental expertise [31]. For fast light the corresponding angle ∆α ℓ should be far too small to be observed.…”
Section: Polarisation Rotation Of Slow Light With Oammentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The precision of the Boulder measurement for the first (and so-far only) time also allowed for the detection of NSD-PNC effects, which led to a determination of the 133 Cs nuclear AM [3,45]. The more recent measurements of the Paris group [34,35] (see also [46]) used a different method-chiral optical gain-to detect the PNC signal. The results using this method are not at the same level of accuracy as the Boulder measurements [3], however, promising progress has been made.…”
Section: Parity Nonconservation In Cesiummentioning
confidence: 99%