2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11090-006-9013-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed Plasma Polymerisation of Butylacrylate for Pressure-Sensitive Adhesion

Abstract: Pulsed plasma polymerisation of butylacrylate monomer is found to lead to the deposition of polymeric films which are structurally very similar to conventional poly(butylacrylate). Carbon dioxide or oxygen plasma post treatment of these surfaces significantly improves their adhesive performance due to greater Lewis acid-base interactions at the interface.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Other important contributors in the field include Griesser, 26 Knoll, 27 Cooper, 28 Badyal, 29 Goeckner 30 and Timmons. 31 A matching network (MN) is used to match the impedance of the generator to that of the plasma (see Fig.…”
Section: Reactor Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Other important contributors in the field include Griesser, 26 Knoll, 27 Cooper, 28 Badyal, 29 Goeckner 30 and Timmons. 31 A matching network (MN) is used to match the impedance of the generator to that of the plasma (see Fig.…”
Section: Reactor Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These polymer films can be highly functionalised and have been applied in a diverse range of applications, but especially in the field of biomaterials . In general, there are two types of reactor system used in laboratories undertaking this type of research: glass‐wall reactor systems with external electrodes (which may be in the form of copper bands or external coils as in so‐called ‘inductive’ radiofrequency plasma sources but which are nevertheless capacitively coupled systems when operated at low powers) and stainless steel or glass‐walled systems with internal electrodes (which are capacitively coupled).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hexyl acrylate monomer displays the following characteristic infrared absorption bands: C—H stretching (3000–2830 cm −1 ), acrylate carbonyl CO stretching (1724 cm −1 ), acrylate CC stretching (1638 cm −1 and 1631 cm −1 ), and the C—O ester stretch (1182 cm −1 ), as shown in Figure S5, Supporting Information. [ 48 ] Pulsed plasma‐deposited poly(hexyl acrylate) shows loss of the acrylate carbon–carbon double bond infrared absorbance features, thereby confirming that polymerization took place. [ 35 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hexyl acrylate monomer displays the following characteristic infrared absorption bands: C-H stretching (3000-2830 cm À1 ), acrylate carbonyl C═O stretching (1724 cm À1 ), acrylate C═C stretching (1638 cm À1 and 1631 cm À1 ), and the C-O ester stretch (1182 cm À1 ), as shown in Figure S5, Supporting Information. [48] Pulsed plasma-deposited poly(hexyl acrylate) shows loss of the acrylate carbon-carbon double bond infrared absorbance features, thereby confirming that polymerization took place. [35] Atomic force microscopy (AFM) roughness measurements showed that the pulsed plasma poly(hexyl acrylate) coating surface is not significantly more rough compared with uncoated silicon wafer substrate (Roughness RMS ¼ 1.99 nm vs 0.68 nm, respectively, for 10 μm scan size)-which is typical of low-duty cycle pulsed plasma-deposited polymer nanocoatings, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Pulsed Plasma Poly(hexyl Acrylate)mentioning
confidence: 87%