Thermoluminescence (TL) and thermally stimulated conductivity (TSC) glow curves in poly(vinyl chloride), polyethylene, polystyrene, polytetrafluoroethylene, and polyimide have been compared, and many similarities have been observed. Comparison with available NMR, dynamic mechanical loss, and dielectric loss, molecular mobility data shows that most TL and TSC peaks occur at temperatures similar to those assigned to the onset of specific molecular motions, suggesting that the peaks are due to the liberation of electrons from traps formed by the polymer chains themselves, e.g., potential wells or cavities due to chain entanglement in amorphous regions, or main‐chain branching points. Peaks for which correlation with molecular motion is not apparent are tentatively assigned to liberation of electrons from traps centered on impurities. The TSC peak temperatures in PVC were not affected in any consistent fashion by the application of high‐strength electric fields during the warming process, indicating that the electron traps are electrically neutral when empty and charged when filled; the direction of the TSC currents appears to be determined by temperature gradients existing within the samples. The TL glow‐curves are generally in good agreement with the results of other workers. The dark dc conductivity of PVC not exposed to ionizing radiation rises sharply in the temperature region assigned to the β‐relaxation process, suggesting that the electron mobility in that polymer is dominated by molecular chain motion, i.e., the interchain charge transport process is probably best described in terms of a hopping process.