2012
DOI: 10.2150/jlve.ieij120000482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed Light at Lower Duty Ratios with Lower Frequencies is Less Advantageous than Continuous Light for CO<sub>2</sub> Uptake in Cos Lettuce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of stored PI should not approach saturation during short light periods at high frequencies, and PI synthesis cannot be performed with high efficiency. Similar results were obtained with lettuce leaves (Jishi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Photosynthesis Mechanism Under Pulsed Lightsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The amount of stored PI should not approach saturation during short light periods at high frequencies, and PI synthesis cannot be performed with high efficiency. Similar results were obtained with lettuce leaves (Jishi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Photosynthesis Mechanism Under Pulsed Lightsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the pulsed light technique for growing tomato plants, low frequencies (0.1, 1, 10 Hz) had higher quantum efficiency in PSII than higher frequencies (50, 100 kHz) and continuous light, but the electron transport rate decreased when the frequency of pulse increased [11]. On the other hand, pulsed light of lower duty ratios, combined with lower frequencies, makes the CO 2 uptake rate of cos lettuce lower than that attained in continuous light, inferring that pulsed illumination with such a condition is less advantageous than continuous light for photosynthesis [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Previous studies estimated that the photosynthetic rate for various crops responded differently to pulsed lighting and highly depended on the frequency and duty ratio of pulsed light [ 21 ]. For instance, Jishi et al [ 22 ] explored the effects of pulsed LEDs at different frequencies (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4, 12.8 kHz; 75% duty ratio) on romaine lettuce and did not find a significant effect on net photosynthesis compared to continuous light. Kanechi [ 12 ] found that photosynthetic rate of lettuce under pulsed light (0.5–500 Hz, 1–20 kHz, 50% duty ratio) was slightly higher than that under continuous light, and this is consistent with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%