1992
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)81375-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed electric current enhances the phorbol ester induced oxidative burst in human neutrophils

Abstract: Oxidative burst (OB) response in human ncutrophils. measured with chcmiluminesccncc (CL), has been used to dcterminc whether pulsed electric current (PEC) might induce a functional response in these electrically nonexcitable cells, and also whether it might modify cellular response to tumor-promoting pborbol ester (PMA). Five minutes of PEC lreatmcnt caused no significant chanBcs in ncutrophil CL levels in HBSS (I.2 mM Ca" concentration) aa well as in HBSS-EGTA, where the extracellular Ca2+ concentration was r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these processes are tied to cell locomotion and may be driven by the cadence of the oscillatory metabolic/signaling machinery. Previous workers have reported small, but significant, increases in the respiratory burst of activated neutrophils in the presence of pulsed electric fields or low frequency magnetic fields (Bobanovic et al, 1992;Roy et al, 1995). In the present study, activation with mediators such as phorbol esters was not required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…All of these processes are tied to cell locomotion and may be driven by the cadence of the oscillatory metabolic/signaling machinery. Previous workers have reported small, but significant, increases in the respiratory burst of activated neutrophils in the presence of pulsed electric fields or low frequency magnetic fields (Bobanovic et al, 1992;Roy et al, 1995). In the present study, activation with mediators such as phorbol esters was not required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%