1975
DOI: 10.1021/ja00838a022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed carbon-13 Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of monohalo-substituted cyclohexanes at low temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solid-state 13 C spectra of the TOAB, AT-4, AT-2, and AT-0.5 samples are shown in Figure a. As expected, in the solid state, the signals are shifted to higher chemical shifts due to the predominance of segments with an all-trans conformation, leading to the loss of the γ-gauche shielding effect (Table ). More importantly, in the 13 C spectrum of AT-4 one can see the emergence of new signals besides the relatively stronger signals of pure TOAB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The solid-state 13 C spectra of the TOAB, AT-4, AT-2, and AT-0.5 samples are shown in Figure a. As expected, in the solid state, the signals are shifted to higher chemical shifts due to the predominance of segments with an all-trans conformation, leading to the loss of the γ-gauche shielding effect (Table ). More importantly, in the 13 C spectrum of AT-4 one can see the emergence of new signals besides the relatively stronger signals of pure TOAB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It is well-known that in the liquid phase, the e-conformer is more stable, and that upon cooling the liquid, the e-conformer should be even more preferred. [40,41] Based on previous infrared studies, we conclude that we may have some of the a-conformer in the matrix. Our evidence for this comes from the fact that although most of the parent bands are identical for the a-versus e-conformer, there are a few bands for which the a-conformer's fundamental does not overlap with that of the e-conformer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“… a Experimental error is ±0.5 Hz. b Calculated values were obtained at the SOPPA(CCSD)/EPR-III and DFT/B3LYP/EPR-III levels. DFT-calculated values are shown in parentheses. c Only absolute values of these couplings were measured in this work. d Taken from ref . …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%