2010
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1364-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse shape simulation for segmented true-coaxial HPGe detectors

Abstract: A new package to simulate the formation of electrical pulses in segmented true-coaxial high purity germanium detectors is presented. The computation of the electric field and weighting potentials inside the detector as well as of the trajectories of the charge carriers is described. In addition, the treatment of bandwidth limitations and noise are discussed. Comparison of simulated to measured pulses, obtained from an 18-fold segmented detector operated inside a cryogenic test facility, are presented.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15). A few detectors like GD35B, however, fluctuate up to ±30 % translating into a ∼0.1 mm [43] FCCD difference. The count rate profile on the front side area of these detectors is characterized by higher count rates at the center and at the outermost bor- Spatial dependence of the pulse shape response The pulse shapes of events in a ±4.5 σ region around the 60 keV γ -peak were investigated for every scanned point.…”
Section: Surface Scans With 241 Am Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15). A few detectors like GD35B, however, fluctuate up to ±30 % translating into a ∼0.1 mm [43] FCCD difference. The count rate profile on the front side area of these detectors is characterized by higher count rates at the center and at the outermost bor- Spatial dependence of the pulse shape response The pulse shapes of events in a ±4.5 σ region around the 60 keV γ -peak were investigated for every scanned point.…”
Section: Surface Scans With 241 Am Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drift velocity anisotropy can cause considerable differences in pulse shape rise time depending on the spatial position of the charge carrier creation. Experimentally, the dependence of pulse shapes on the electron drift velocity 110 anisotropy in closed-end HPGe detectors has been clearly established [14], as well as its influence on tracking algorithms [15]. Anisotropy in the drift velocity for holes is also a major concern when dealing with semi-conducting devices operating at high-115 electric fields, where deviation from low-field ohmic behavior is observed [16].…”
Section: Pulse Shape Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next-generation devices advancing current frontiers 10 of nuclear spectroscopy are eliminating the lowresolution scintillator envelopes entirely and consist of a 4π HPGe shell. The individual crystals have electrically segmented outer contacts which can be used to reconstruct gamma-ray interaction points 15 with σ ∼ 2mm RMS resolution [1], [2]. This position sensitivity is necessary to allow gamma-ray tracking through the HPGe volume, which enables the iden- * Corresponding author.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See e.g. [1,2] for a detailed description of the pulse creation process. For photons in the MeV range, the dominant interaction process is Compton scattering.…”
Section: Pulse-shape Discrimination For Hpge Detectors Using Artificimentioning
confidence: 99%