1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(86)80013-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse oximetry for vascular monitoring in upper extremity replantation surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reflective plethysmography takes advantage of the back-scattering of light to the surface (i.e., forehead). Published studies using these techniques to determine tissue perfusion have been performed on small bowel (20), reimplanted fingers (21), and free flaps (22). …”
Section: Pulse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflective plethysmography takes advantage of the back-scattering of light to the surface (i.e., forehead). Published studies using these techniques to determine tissue perfusion have been performed on small bowel (20), reimplanted fingers (21), and free flaps (22). …”
Section: Pulse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have successfully adopted this concept to routinely monitor replants (6) and digital transfers (3,7), but free flap monitoring has been ©2003 Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reserved…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulse oximetry values greater than 95% have been associated with a viable digit and decreasing values have been suggestive of arterial or venous occlusion. 5 Pulse oximetry, however, requires pulsatile flow for accurate readings, which is not always detectable in the immediate postoperative setting. Surface thermometry is easy and inexpensive but measurements are influenced by other factors and thus are not very reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No currently available device has become accepted widely for routine monitoring because of complexity or poor sensitivity and specificity. [5][6][7][8] Serial quantitative fluorescence is a minimally invasive, reliable technique for digit monitoring; however, it is labor intensive. 9,10 It also carries the risk for adverse effects, although these are infrequent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%