2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-26048/v3
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse oximetry curves in healthy children living at moderate altitude: a cross-sectional study from the Ecuadorian Andes

Abstract: Background In populations above 3,000 meters above sea level (m.a.s.l.) normal values of oxygen saturation (SpO2) above 90% have been reported. Few studies have been conducted in cities of moderate altitude (between 2,500 and 3,000 m a.s.l). We set out to describe the range of SpO2 values measured with a pulse oximeter in healthy children between 1 month and 12 years of age living in an Ecuadorian Andean city. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in Quito, Ecuador, located at 2,810 m a.s.l. SpO2 me… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The 90% cutoff threshold may not be as beneficial at elevations higher than 3,000 m asl ( above sea level), where oxygen saturation rates are lower than at sea level. 2 The "normal" SpO 2 (Pulse oximetry oxygen saturation) at sea level has been determined to be between 95% and 100% in clinical practice; nevertheless, other writers consider readings between 95% and 96% to be abnormal. 1 As previously discussed, it might be difficult to pinpoint the precise cut-off value for oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The 90% cutoff threshold may not be as beneficial at elevations higher than 3,000 m asl ( above sea level), where oxygen saturation rates are lower than at sea level. 2 The "normal" SpO 2 (Pulse oximetry oxygen saturation) at sea level has been determined to be between 95% and 100% in clinical practice; nevertheless, other writers consider readings between 95% and 96% to be abnormal. 1 As previously discussed, it might be difficult to pinpoint the precise cut-off value for oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%