1996
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61142-8_545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PULSAR: Parallel noise despeckling of SAR images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore define the neighboring CM's by means of the original central sample CM, i.e., , with the factors being real scalars. Solving the log likelihood equation with respect to these factors, i.e., , yields (27) This shows, that the overall highest probability (26) is obtained, if the neighbors within the connection filter are given as . The mean CM estimate from this specific filter is biased as , and to derive the expression of the bias resulting from this filter, we insert in the MLE for the mean CM (17) giving (28) This expression only depends on the number of looks of the original data, , on the number of neighbors within the connection filter, , and on the dimension of the CM, .…”
Section: Bias Of the Mean CM Estimatementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We therefore define the neighboring CM's by means of the original central sample CM, i.e., , with the factors being real scalars. Solving the log likelihood equation with respect to these factors, i.e., , yields (27) This shows, that the overall highest probability (26) is obtained, if the neighbors within the connection filter are given as . The mean CM estimate from this specific filter is biased as , and to derive the expression of the bias resulting from this filter, we insert in the MLE for the mean CM (17) giving (28) This expression only depends on the number of looks of the original data, , on the number of neighbors within the connection filter, , and on the dimension of the CM, .…”
Section: Bias Of the Mean CM Estimatementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The number of iterations used for a specific application is obviously a compromise between the desired degree of speckle reduction and the work load of the restoration. It should be noted, that an almost linear relation between the speed-ups and the number of processors is expected if applying parallel computing to the restoration algorithm [27].…”
Section: Speckle Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%