2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary vein isolation cryoablation for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: Clinical outcomes from the real-world multicenter observational project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
60
2
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
11
60
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Takarada et al reported an AF‐free survival without AADs after a single procedure was 71.5% in paroxysmal AF patients at a mean 38.0 ± 7.4 months follow‐up. Furthermore, in the multicenter Italian Clinical Service 1STOP project, Tondo et al reported that the AF‐free survival was 63.9% at 12 months and 51.5% at 18 months in 486 nonparoxysmal AF patients. Furthermore, Akkaya et al reported a 67.9% ATa‐free success rate in 102 persistent AF patients with a 5‐year follow‐up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takarada et al reported an AF‐free survival without AADs after a single procedure was 71.5% in paroxysmal AF patients at a mean 38.0 ± 7.4 months follow‐up. Furthermore, in the multicenter Italian Clinical Service 1STOP project, Tondo et al reported that the AF‐free survival was 63.9% at 12 months and 51.5% at 18 months in 486 nonparoxysmal AF patients. Furthermore, Akkaya et al reported a 67.9% ATa‐free success rate in 102 persistent AF patients with a 5‐year follow‐up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with AF who had undergone CB‐PVI (using CB‐1, −2, −3, or −4) in 47 Italian institutions from April 2012 to April 2019 were prospectively followed through in‐hospital visits according to each center's clinical practice through the framework of the Italian ClinicalService and 1STOP project . In brief, the project (Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01007474) is a prospective examination of CB ablations conducted in Italian cardiology centers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we examined patients that were treated for AF using the CB‐1 vs CB‐2 vs CB‐3 vs CB‐4. These four cohorts were compared in a real‐world multicenter examination of procedural safety and efficacy utilizing a retrospective review of data held within the 1STOP Italian registry project …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, among all the different therapeutic options in the setting of patients with drug‐refractory paroxysmal AF, PVI by CB‐A has proven to be noninferior to PVI performed by RF ablation in terms of both efficacy and safety . Subsequently, also in the context of persistent and long‐standing persistent AF, CB‐A has demonstrated to be safe and effective. The overall comparability of these two different techniques, after being addressed by the FIRE and ICE trial, was recently confirmed by an observational cluster cohort study by Hoffmann et al, who showed no difference between CB‐A and RF ablation in terms of atrial arrhythmia recurrence and, furthermore, significantly less rehospitalization due to re‐ablations and adverse events during follow‐up after CB‐A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In particular, among all the different therapeutic options in the setting of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF, PVI by CB-A has proven to be noninferior to PVI performed by RF ablation in terms of both efficacy and safety. 19,20 Subsequently, also in the context of persistent 21,22 and long-standing persistent 22 AF, CB-A has demonstrated to be safe and effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%