2019
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary vein encirclement using an Ablation Index-guided point-by-point workflow: cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of left atrial scar formation

Abstract: Aims A point-by-point workflow for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) targeting pre-defined Ablation Index values (a composite of contact force, time, and power) and minimizing interlesion distance may optimize the creation of contiguous ablation lesions whilst minimizing scar formation. We aimed to compare ablation scar formation in patients undergoing PVI using this workflow to patients undergoing a continuous catheter drag workflow. Methods and results Post-ablation cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These points are labeled as such in userdata.electric.tags and have location data stored in userdata.electric.egmX and .egmSurfX but have no linked electrical data. Modern electroanatomic mapping systems provide metrics which quantify energy delivery (and seek to predict lesion size) during radiofrequency ablation, such as the Lesion Size Index (Whitaker et al, 2018) and Ablation Index (O'Neill et al, 2019). Since these indices vary per-platform and per-case, OpenEP provides helper functions for accessing radiofrequency index data which is appended to userdata and then stored in the subfields of userdata.rfindex.…”
Section: Ablation Point Input and Displaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These points are labeled as such in userdata.electric.tags and have location data stored in userdata.electric.egmX and .egmSurfX but have no linked electrical data. Modern electroanatomic mapping systems provide metrics which quantify energy delivery (and seek to predict lesion size) during radiofrequency ablation, such as the Lesion Size Index (Whitaker et al, 2018) and Ablation Index (O'Neill et al, 2019). Since these indices vary per-platform and per-case, OpenEP provides helper functions for accessing radiofrequency index data which is appended to userdata and then stored in the subfields of userdata.rfindex.…”
Section: Ablation Point Input and Displaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To generate the scar map, the Scar Quantification pipeline of CemrgApp was used as described in previous studies [7], [8]. The pipeline consists of a semi-automatic segmentation of the MRA scan.…”
Section: Input Data and Scar Map Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ii) Assessing ablation lesions. Following a procedure similar to the one shown in [8], an encircling corridor around the veins is generated via user-defined points. The points are joined by the Dijkstra algorithm, calculating the shortest path weighted by the signal intensity values.…”
Section: Advanced Scar Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ablation Index is a weighted formula incorporating power, contact force, and time. 4 Similarly, the competing Lesion Size Index is a weighted formula incorporating contact force, time and current. 5 Notably, in Bourier et al's 3…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, ablation parameters have been incorporated into the clinically available lesion metric indices discussed by the authors. The Ablation Index is a weighted formula incorporating power, contact force, and time 4 . Similarly, the competing Lesion Size Index is a weighted formula incorporating contact force, time and current 5 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%