2010
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.136085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with MRC Dyspnoea Scale 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two retrospective observational studies have shown that patients who have a MRC dyspnoea score of 2 obtain similar improvement in exercise capacity to patients with MRC scores of 3–5 76 77. Both studies examined approximately 450 patients who completed outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation and in each study more than 100 patients with MRC dyspnoea scores of 2 were included.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two retrospective observational studies have shown that patients who have a MRC dyspnoea score of 2 obtain similar improvement in exercise capacity to patients with MRC scores of 3–5 76 77. Both studies examined approximately 450 patients who completed outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation and in each study more than 100 patients with MRC dyspnoea scores of 2 were included.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 In summary, we have described the development of a PR model for people with COPD. As such, pre-and postintervention assessments were not blinded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Individuals with mMRC scores 1 and 2 have been shown to improve exercise performance and health status as much as individuals with higher mMRC scores. [12][13][14][15] PR programs for mild COPD have also been successful with similar improvements in exercise capacity, quality of life scores, and symptoms as in programs for more severe COPD. 16,17 Evidence has shown that degree of lung impairment alone (assessed by spirometry) is poorly correlated with exercise capacity 12,18 and health status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%