Abstract:Background
A comparison of the longitudinal progression of lung disease in cystic fibrosis patients identified through newborn screening (NBS) in cohorts located in two different countries has never been performed and was the primary objective of this study.
Methods
The study included 56 patients in Brittany diagnosed through NBS between 1989 and 1994 and 69 similar patients in Wisconsin between 1985 and 1994. The onset and progression of lung disease was radiographically quantified using the Wisconsin Chest… Show more
“…CF-related survival differences between countries are difficult to explain and have been variably ascribed to differences in rates of care in specialised centres [7] (with centralised care said to confer an advantage [8] ), distribution of CF genotypes [9] , antibiotic regimens to treat or prevent infection and variations in nutrition and environmental exposure [10] . Countries also vary in rates of diagnosis [11] and it is also clear that the prevalence of CF has reduced since the introduction of newborn screening [12] , the implementation of which has varied between countries.…”
BackgroundIt is unclear why cystic fibrosis (CF) survival has improved. We wished to quantify increases in CF median age of death in the context of general population survival improvement.MethodDeath registration data analysis (US, England & Wales (E&W)—1972–2009).ResultsCF median age of death is higher in US than E&W and greater for males, opposite to that of death from all causes. CF median age of death has increased by 0.543 life years per year (E&W, US combined (95% confidence interval 0.506, 0.582)). The difference in median age at death between those dying from all causes and CF decreased in both territories. CF median age of death for males is greater than for females in both territories. This gap has not narrowed.ConclusionThe median age of death of people with CF is improving more rapidly than that of the general population in US and E&W.
“…CF-related survival differences between countries are difficult to explain and have been variably ascribed to differences in rates of care in specialised centres [7] (with centralised care said to confer an advantage [8] ), distribution of CF genotypes [9] , antibiotic regimens to treat or prevent infection and variations in nutrition and environmental exposure [10] . Countries also vary in rates of diagnosis [11] and it is also clear that the prevalence of CF has reduced since the introduction of newborn screening [12] , the implementation of which has varied between countries.…”
BackgroundIt is unclear why cystic fibrosis (CF) survival has improved. We wished to quantify increases in CF median age of death in the context of general population survival improvement.MethodDeath registration data analysis (US, England & Wales (E&W)—1972–2009).ResultsCF median age of death is higher in US than E&W and greater for males, opposite to that of death from all causes. CF median age of death has increased by 0.543 life years per year (E&W, US combined (95% confidence interval 0.506, 0.582)). The difference in median age at death between those dying from all causes and CF decreased in both territories. CF median age of death for males is greater than for females in both territories. This gap has not narrowed.ConclusionThe median age of death of people with CF is improving more rapidly than that of the general population in US and E&W.
“…Progression of disease continued throughout childhood, including worsening of airway resistance [45], airway inflammation [78], air trapping [45,124], lung structure [35,40,43,[123][124][125][126], lung function (Fig. 2) [58,61,63,66,112,123], and nutrient deficiencies [127,128].…”
Section: Progression Of Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progression of disease continued throughout childhood, including worsening of airway resistance [45], airway inflammation [78], air trapping [45,124], lung structure [35,40,43,[123][124][125][126], lung function (Fig. 2) [58,61,63,66,112,123], and nutrient deficiencies [127,128]. Accumulation of lung damage was evident by 1 year of age [36,123,124], and lung structure and function worsened significantly each year of life in young children aged 0 to 6 years [35,43,58,123,124].…”
Section: Progression Of Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) [58,61,63,66,112,123], and nutrient deficiencies [127,128]. Accumulation of lung damage was evident by 1 year of age [36,123,124], and lung structure and function worsened significantly each year of life in young children aged 0 to 6 years [35,43,58,123,124]. One study, however, reported that although 4 spirometric measures of lung function all worsened between ages 0 to 5 years and 6 to 16 years, they worsened by a significant amount from measures recorded in younger age groups only at ages older than 16 years [40].…”
The peer-reviewed literature is remarkably consistent: CF-associated growth impairment and airway abnormalities are reported at birth, and disease progression is reported in infancy and throughout childhood. Earlier access to routine CF management is associated with improved subsequent health status.
“…Furthermore, there is a lack of documented evidence that survival or lung function are better in countries with CF NBS than in those without screening. In comparison, differences in treatment practices across countries and centers unrelated to NBS can result in large differences in the magnitudes of clinical outcomes in CF [ 98 , 99 ].…”
Decision makers sometimes request information on the cost savings,
cost-effectiveness, or cost-benefit of public health programs. In practice, quantifying
the health and economic benefits of population-level screening programs such as newborn
screening (NBS) is challenging. It requires that one specify the frequencies of health
outcomes and events, such as hospitalizations, for a cohort of children with a given
condition under two different scenarios—with or without NBS. Such analyses also
assume that everything else, including treatments, is the same between groups. Lack of
comparable data for representative screened and unscreened cohorts that are exposed to the
same treatments following diagnosis can result in either under- or over-statement of
differences. Accordingly, the benefits of early detection may be understated or
overstated. This paper illustrates these common problems through a review of past economic
evaluations of screening for two historically significant conditions, phenylketonuria and
cystic fibrosis. In both examples qualitative judgments about the value of prompt
identification and early treatment to an affected child were more influential than
specific numerical estimates of lives or costs saved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.