“…For instance, the second-highest sensitivity is 96.8% (a 0.7% difference with ours) by Wang et al, 2019 [24], but at 27 times more false positives. For another comparison, ISODATA (a K-meansbased clustering method) for anchor box sizes, proposed in [8], achieved 91.4% (a 6.1% difference with ours) at 3.19 FPs/s (1.45 times more false positives than ours). These results imply that the adaptive anchors generated by our Meanshift based method are more effective for nodule candidate detection than other manually designed anchors and other clustering methods, such as K-means or ISODATA.…”